There are a plethora of technologies used to carry out software development projects, what needs to be done is a thorough analysis from industry experts

Containerized applications are ephemeral, which means any data created by a container is lost as soon as the process terminates. This requires a pragmatic approach to data persistence and management when orchestrating containers using Kubernetes. To deal with this, the Kubernetes orchestration platform uses Volume plugins to isolate storage consumption from provisioned hardware. A Persistent Volume (PV) is a Kubernetes API resource that provisions persistent storage for PODs. Cluster resources can use a PV construct to mount any storage unit -- file system folders or block storage options -- to Kubernetes nodes. PODs request for a PV using Persistent Volumes Claims (PVC). These storage integrations and other features make it possible for containerized applications to share data with other containers and preserve the container state. PVs can be provisioned statically by the cluster administrator or dynamically using Storage Classes. Some important features that distinguish different Storage Classes include Capacity, Volume Mode, Access Modes, Performance and Resiliency. When a Local Disk is attached directly to a single Kubernetes node, it is known as a Local PV which provides the best performance and is only accessible from a single node where it is attached. This post explores why LocalPV and NVMe storage should be used for Kubernetes workloads. Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) for Kubernetes NVMe is a high-speed access protocol that delivers low latency and high throughput for SSD storage devices by connecting them to the processor through a PCIe interface. Early SSDs connected to the CPU through SATA or Serial Attached SCSi (SAS). These relied on legacy standards customized for Hard Disk speeds which were considered inefficient since each connection to the processor remained limited by synchronized locking or the SAS Host Bus Adapter (HBA). To overcome this challenge, NVMe unlocks the true potential of flash storage using the Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) that supports high performance, Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA). NVMe also supports parallel processing, with 64K Input-Output queues with each queue having 64K entries. This high-bandwidth, low-latency storage hosts applications that can create as many I/O queues as system configuration, workload and the NVMe controller allows. Following a NUMA based storage protocol, NVMe allows different CPUs to manage I/O queues, using various arbitration mechanisms. Modern enterprises are data-driven, with users and devices generating huge amounts of data that may overwhelm companies. By enhancing the capabilities of multi-core CPUs, NVMe provides low latency and fast transfer rates for better access and processing of large data sets. NVMe devices typically rely on NAND Flash Memory that can be hosted on various SSD form factors including normal SSDs, U2 Cards, M2 Cards, and PCIe Add-In Cards. NVMe over Fabrics (NVMe-oF) extends the advantages of NVMe storage access by implementing the NVMe protocol for remotely connected devices. The architecture allows one node to directly access a storage device of another computer over several transport protocols. NVMe Architecture In NVMe architecture, the host computer is connected to SSD storage devices via a high throughput Host-Controller Interface. The storage service is composed of three main elements: SSD Controllers The PCIe Host Interface Non-Volatile Memory (e.g., NAND Flash) To submit queues to the Input/Output, the NVMe controller utilizes Memory-Mapped Controller Registers and the host system’s DRAM. The number of mapped registers determines the number of parallel I/O operations the protocol can support. A typical NVMe storage architecture Advantages of Using NVMe for Kubernetes Clusters PCIe reduces the need for various abstract implementation layers, allowing for faster, efficient storage. Some benefits of using NVMe for storage include: Efficient memory transfer - NVMe protocol only requires one ring per CPU to communicate directly with Non-Volatile Memory, thereby reducing locking speeds for I/O controllers. NVMe also enables parallelism by combining the number of Message Signalled Interrupts with multi-core CPUs to further reduce latency. Secured Cluster Data - NVMe-oF enables secure tunnelling protocols developed and managed by reputable data security communities such as the Trusted Security Group (TSG). This enables enterprise-grade security features such as Encryption at REST, Access Control and Crypto-Erase for cluster nodes and SSD storage devices. Supports Multi-Core Computing - The NVMe protocol utilizes a private queueing strategy to support up to 64K commands per queue over 64K queues. Since every controller has its own set of queues, the throughput increases linearly with the number of CPU cores available. Requires Fewer Instructions to Process I/O requests - NVMe relies on an efficient set of commands to half the number of CPU instructions required to implement Input-Output operations. This reduces latency while enabling advanced security features like reservations and power management for cluster administrators. Why use LocalPV with NVMe Storage for Kubernetes Clusters? While most storage systems used to persist data for Kubernetes clusters are remote and independent of the source nodes, it is possible to attach a local disk directly to a single node. Locally attached storage typically guarantees higher performance and tighter security than remote storage. A Kubernetes LocalPV represents a portion of local disk storage that can be used for data persistence in StatefulSets. With LocalPV, the local disk is specified as a persistent volume that can be consumed with the same PVC and Storage Class abstractions used for remote storage. This results in low latency storage that is suitable for fault-tolerant use-cases such as: Distributed data stores that share replicated data across multiple nodes LocalPV can also be used to cache data sets that require faster processing over data gravity LocalPV vs. hostPath Volumes Before the introduction of LocalPV volumes, hostPath volumes were used for accessing local storage. There were certain challenges while orchestrating local storage with hostPath as it didn’t support important Kubernetes features, such as StatefulSets. Additionally, hostPath volumes required separate operators for disk management, POD scheduling and topology, making them difficult to use in production environments. LocalPV volumes were designed in response to issues with the scheduling, disk accounting and portability of hostPath volumes. One of the major distinctions is that the Kubernetes control plane knows the Node that owns a LocalPV. With hostPath, data is lost when a POD referencing the volume is scheduled to a different node. LocalPV volumes can only be referenced using a Persistent Volume Claim (PVC) while hostPath volumes can be referenced both directly in the POD definition file and via PVC. How to Configure a Kubernetes Cluster with LocalPV NVMe Storage Workloads can be configured to access NVMe SSDs on a local machine using LocalPV and a Persistent Volume Claim, or StatefulSet with volume claim attributes. This section explores how to attach a local disk to a Kubernetes cluster with NVMe storage configured. The first step is to create a storage class that enables Volume Topology-Aware Scheduling. This will instruct the Kubernetes API to not bind a PVC until a Pod consuming the PVC is scheduled. The configuration file for the storage class will be similar to: YAML $ cat sc.yaml apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1 kind: StorageClass metadata: name: openebs-device-sc allowVolumeExpansion: true parameters: devname: "test-device" provisioner: device.csi.openebs.io volumeBindingMode: WaitForFirstConsumer Check the doc on storageclasses to know all the supported parameters for Device LocalPV. If the device with a meta partition is available on certain nodes only, then make use of topology to tell the list of nodes where we have the devices available. As shown in the below storage class, we can use allowedTopologies to describe device availability on nodes. YAML apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1 kind: StorageClass metadata: name: openebs-device-sc allowVolumeExpansion: true parameters: devname: "test-device" provisioner: device.csi.openebs.io allowedTopologies: - matchLabelExpressions: - key: kubernetes.io/hostname values: - device-node1 - device-node2 The above storage class tells that device with meta partition test-device is available on nodes device-node1 and device-node2 only. The Device CSI driver will create volumes on those nodes only. The OpenEBS Device driver has its own scheduler which will try to distribute the PV across the nodes so that one node should not be loaded with all the volumes. Currently, the driver supports two scheduling algorithms: VolumeWeighted and CapacityWeighted, in which it will try to find a device which has lesser number of volumes provisioned in it or less capacity of volume provisioned out of a device respectively, from all the nodes where the devices are available. To know about how to select a scheduler via storage-class, refer this link. Once it is able to find the node, it will create a PV for that node and also create a DeviceVolume custom resource for the volume with the node information. The watcher for this DeviceVolume CR will get all the information for this object and create a partition with the given size on the mentioned node. The scheduling algorithm currently only accounts for either the number of volumes or total capacity occupied from a device and does not account for other factors like available cpu or memory while making scheduling decisions. So if you want to use node selector/affinity rules on the application pod, or have cpu/memory constraints, a Kubernetes scheduler should be used. To make use of kubernetes scheduler, you can set the volumeBindingMode as WaitForFirstConsumer in the storage class. This will cause a delayed binding, i.e Kubernetes scheduler will schedule the application pod first, and then it will ask the Device driver to create the PV. The driver will then create the PV on the node where the pod is scheduled. YAML apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1 kind: StorageClass metadata: name: openebs-device-sc allowVolumeExpansion: true parameters: devname: "test-device" provisioner: device.csi.openebs.io volumeBindingMode: WaitForFirstConsumer Please note that once a PV is created for a node, the application using that PV will always get scheduled to that particular node only, as PV will be sticky to that node. The scheduling algorithm by Device driver or kubernetes will come into picture only during the deployment time. Once the PV is created, the application can not move anywhere as the data is there on the node where the PV is. Create a PVC using the storage class created for the device driver. YAML $ cat pvc.yaml kind: PersistentVolumeClaim apiVersion: v1 metadata: name: csi-devicepv spec: storageClassName: openebs-device-sc accessModes: - ReadWriteOnce resources: requests: storage: 4Gi Create the deployment YAML using the PVC backed by device driver storage. YAML $ cat fio.yaml apiVersion: v1 kind: Pod metadata: name: fio spec: restartPolicy: Never containers: - name: perfrunner image: openebs/tests-fio command: ["/bin/bash"] args: ["-c", "while true ;do sleep 50; done"] volumeMounts: - mountPath: /datadir name: fio-vol tty: true volumes: - name: fio-vol persistentVolumeClaim: claimName: csi-devicepv After the deployment of the application, we can go to the node and see that the partition is created and is being used as a volume by the application for reading/writing the data. Advantages of Using LocalPV with NVMe for Kubernetes Operators Some benefits of integrating LocalPV into clusters using NVMe for storage include: Compared to remotely connected storage systems, Local Persistent Volumes support more Input-Output Operations Per Second (IOPS) and throughput since the volume directory is directly mounted on the node. This means that with LocalPV Volumes, organizations can hone in on the high performance offered by NVMe SSDs. LocalPV also enables the dynamic reservation of storage resources needed for stateful services. This makes it easy to relaunch a process on the same node using the same SSD volume. LocalPV volume configuration pins tasks to the nodes where their data resides, eliminating the need for scheduling constraints, thereby enabling quicker access of SSDs through NVMe. Destroying a LocalPV is as easy as deleting the PVC consuming it, allowing for simpler storage management. Summary Non-Volatile Memory Express (NVMe) enhances data storage and access by leveraging the performance benefits of flash memory for SSD based storage. By connecting storage devices to the CPU directly via the PCIe interface, data companies eliminate the bottlenecks associated with SATA or SAS based access. LocalPV reduces the data path between storage and Kubernetes nodes by mounting a volume directly on a Kubernetes node. This results in higher throughput and IOPS, suitable for fault-tolerant stateful applications. OpenEBS by MayaData is one of the popular open-source, agile storage stacks for performance-sensitive databases orchestrated by Kubernetes. Mayastor, OpenEBS’s latest storage engine, delivers very low overhead versus the performance capabilities of underlying devices.. OpenEBS Mayastor does not require NVMe devices or that workloads consume NVMe, although in both cases performance will increase. OpenEBS Mayastor is unique currently amongst open source storage projects in utilizing NVMe internally, to communicate to options OpenEBS replicas. To learn more about how OpenEBS Mayastor, leveraging NVMe as a protocol, performs when leveraging some of the fastest NVMe devices currently available on the market, visit this article. OpenEBS Mayastor builds a foundational layer that enables workloads to coalesce and control storage as needed in a declarative, Kubernetes-native way. While doing so, the user can focus on what's important, that is, deploying and operating stateful workloads. If you’re interested in trying out Mayastor for yourself, instructions for how to set up your own cluster, and run a benchmark like `fio` may be found at https://docs.openebs.io/docs/next/mayastor.html. Related Blogs: https://blog.mayadata.io/the-benefits-of-using-nvme-for-kubernetes https://blog.mayadata.io/mayastor-nvme-of-tcp-performance

In this blog, we will see what is JMS, why it is used, what different features are provided by JMS, and how we can install JMS ActiveMQ on our system.

Safely manage your company's secrets by learning how to access Vault via Node.js applications, retrieve secrets, and interface with Vault via Web UI and CLI.

Know a complete testing list of microservices applications testing tools in this blog and other types of benefits.

Using Neural Networks to replace complex rules and feature engineering based search to provide more accurate and scalable search system that evolves over time.

This article covers using Spark on K8s to overcome dependency on cloud providers and running Apache Spark on Kubernetes.

Java Testing Frameworks provide standardized, extendable ways for programmers and developers to build any software application or web apps.

DevOps is transforming the state of software development worldwide. This article takes a detailed look at the Top 25 DevOps tools currently available.

In this article, we discussed integrating Terraform with Terragrunt and how to automate terraform operations with Atlantis.

Containers are not built to persist data. When a container is created, it only runs the process it hosts and terminates. Any data that it creates or processes are also discarded when the container exits. Containers are built to be ephemeral as this makes them lightweight and helps to keep containerized workloads independent of a host’s filesystem which results in flexible, portable and platform-agnostic applications. These benefits, however, creates a few challenges as well when it comes to orchestrating storage for containerized workloads: The need for appropriate tools that enable data sharing across immutable containers Options for backup and discovery in the event of application failure Means to get rid of stored data once it is no longer needed so that hosts can efficiently handle newer workloads In Kubernetes, PODs are also ephemeral. Kubernetes supports various options to persist data for containerized workloads in different formats. This article explores various tools and strategies that facilitate persistent data storage in Kubernetes. How Kubernetes handles Persistent Storage Kubernetes supports multiple options for the requisition and consumption of storage resources. The basic building block of Kubernetes storage architecture is the volume. This section explores central Kubernetes storage concepts and other integrations that allow for the provisioning of highly available storage for containerized applications. Kubernetes Storage Primitives: Volume A volume is a directory that contains data that can be consumed by containers running in a POD. To attach a volume to a specific POD, it is specified in .spec.volumes and is mounted to containers by specifying in .spec.containers[*].volumeMounts. Kubernetes supports different types of volumes depending on the medium hosting them and their contents. There are two main classes of volumes: Ephemeral volumes - These share the life of a POD and are destroyed as soon as the POD ceases to exist. Persistent Volumes - Exist beyond a POD’s lifetime. Persistent Volume and Persistent Volume Claims A Persistent Volume (PV) is a Kubernetes resource that represents a unit of storage available to the cluster. The lifecycle of a PV is independent of the POD consuming it, so data stored in the PV is available even after containers restart. A PV is an actual Kubernetes object that captures details of how a volume implements storage and is configured using a YAML file with specifications similar to: YAML apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolume metadata: name: darwin-volume labels: type: local spec: storageClassName: dev capacity: storage: 10Gi accessModes: - ReadWriteMany hostPath: path: "/mnt/data" A Persistent Volume Claim (PVC) is the Kubernetes object that PODs use to request a specific portion of storage. The PVC is also a Kubernetes resource and can have specifications similar to: YAML apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolumeClaim metadata: name: darwin-claim spec: storageClassName: dev accessModes: - ReadWriteMany resources: requests: storage: 3Gi A PVC can be attached to a pod with a specification similar to: YAML spec: volumes: - name: darwin-storage persistentVolumeClaim: claimName: darwin-claim containers: - name: darwin-container image: nginx ports: - containerPort: 80 Once the PVC is created in the cluster via the kubectl apply command, the Kubernetes Master Node searches for a PV that meets the requirements listed by the claim. If an appropriate PV exists with the same storageClassName specification, the PV is bound to the volume. Supported Persistent Volumes in Kubernetes Kubernetes supports different kinds of PVs for containerized applications. These include: awsElasticBlockStore (EBS) azureDisk azureFile cephfs Cinder gcePersistentDisk glusterfs hostPath Iscsi portworxVolume storageOS vsphereVolume Storage Classes Every application typically requires storage with different properties to run different workloads. PVCs allow for the static provision of abstracted storage, which restricts the volume’s properties of size and access modes. The StorageClass resource allows cluster administrators to offer volumes with different properties such as performance, access modes or size without exposing the implementation of abstracted storage to users. Using the storageClass resource, cluster administrators can describe the different flavors of storage on offer, mapping to different quality-of-service levels or security policies. The storageClass resource is defined using three main specifications: Provisioner- determines the type of volume plugin used to avail Persistent Volumes Reclaim Policy- tells the cluster how to handle a volume after a PVC releases the PV it is attached to. Parameters- properties of the volumes accepted by a storage class Since the StorageClass lets PVCs access volume resources with minimal human intervention, it enables dynamic provisioning of storage resources. Storage Architecture Kubernetes applications run in containers hosted in PODs. Each POD uses a PVC to request a specific portion of PV. PVs are managed by a control plane, which calls volume plugin API actions using logic used to implement storage. The volume plugins, therefore, allow for access to physical storage. The architecture of Kubernetes storage in clusters: A typical Kubernetes Storage Cluster Storage Plugins Kubernetes supports different storage plugins- managed solutions built with a focus on enabling persistent storage for Kubernetes applications. With third-party plugins, Kubernetes developers and administrators can focus on an enhanced user experience, while vendors configure storage systems. Kubernetes supports all three types of file systems: File Storage Systems - Stores data as a single piece of information organized in a folder accessible through paths. It uses a logical hierarchy to store large arrays of files, making access and navigation simpler. Block Storage - Data is segregated into distinct clusters (blocks). Each block has a unique identifier so that storage drivers can store information in convenient chunks without needing file structures. Block storage offers granular control which is desirable for such use-cases as Mail Servers, Virtual Machines and Databases. Object Storage - Isolates data in encapsulated containers known as objects. Each object gets a unique ID which is stored in a flat memory model. This makes data easier to find in a large pool and also allows for the storage of data in different deployment environments. Object storage is most appropriate for highly flexible and scalable workloads such as Big Data, web applications and backup archives. Container Storage Interface Container Storage Interface (CSI) standardizes the management of persistent storage for containerized applications so that storage plugins can be developed for any container runtime or orchestrator. The CSI is a standard interface that allows storage systems to be exposed to containerized workloads. With CSI, storage product vendors can develop plugins and drivers that work across different orchestration platforms. CSI also defines Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) that enable various storage-related tasks. These tasks include: Dynamic volume provisioning Attaching and detaching nodes to volumes Mounting and unmounting volumes from nodes Consumption of volumes Identification of local storage providers Creating and deleting volume snapshots With the CSI providing a standard approach to the implementation and consumption of storage by containerized applications, a number of solutions have been developed to enable persistent storage. Some top cloud-native storage solutions include: OpenEBS Developed by Mayadata, OpenEBS is an open-source storage solution that entirely runs within the user space as Container Attached Storage. It allows for automated provisioning and high availability through replicated and dynamic Persistent Volumes. Some key features of OpenEBS include: Open-source and vendor-agnostic Utilizes hyperconverged infrastructure Supports both local and replicated volumes Built using microservices-based CAS architecture Portworx Portworx is an end-to-end storage solution for Kubernetes that offers granular storage, data security, migration across multiple cloud platforms and disaster recovery options. Portworx is built for containers from the ground up, making it a popular choice for cloud-native storage. Some features include: Elastic scaling with container-optimized volumes Uses multi-writer shared volumes Storage-aware and application-aware I/O tuning Enables data encryption at volume, storage class and cluster levels Ceph Ceph is founded on the Reliable Autonomic Distributed Object Store (RADOS) to provide pooled storage in a single unified cluster that is highly available, flexible and easy to manage. Ceph relies on the RADOS block storage system to decouple the namespace from underlying hardware to enable the creation of extensive, flexible storage clusters. Ceph features include: Uses the CRUSH algorithm for High Availability Supports file, block and object-storage systems Open-source StorageOS StorageOS is a complete cloud-native software-defined storage platform for running stateful Kubernetes applications. The solution is orchestrated as a cluster of containers that monitor and maintain the state of volumes and cluster nodes. Some features of StorageOS include: Reduces latency by enforcing data locality Uses in-memory caching to speed up volume access Enforces high availability using synchronous replication Utilizes standard AES encryption LongHorn Longhorn is a distributed, lightweight and reliable block storage solution for Kubernetes. It is built using container constructs and orchestrated using Kubernetes, making it a popular cloud native storage solution. Features of LongHorn include: Distributed, enterprise-grade storage with no single point of failure Change block detection for backup Automated, non-disruptive upgrades Incremental snapshots of storage for recovery Directory Mounts Kubernetes uses a hostPath volume to mount a directory from the host’s file system directly to a POD. This is mostly applicable for development and testing on single-node clusters. HostPath volumes are referenced via static provisioning. While not useful in a production environment, this method of persistence is beneficial for several use-cases, including: Running the container advisor (cAdvisor) inside a container When running a container that requires access to Docker internals Allowing a POD to specify whether a given volume path should exist before the POD starts running Containers are immutable, necessitating orchestration mechanisms that allow for the persistence of data they generate and process. Kubernetes uses volume primitives to enable the storage of cluster data. These include Volumes, Persistent Volumes and Persistent Volume Claims. Kubernetes also supports third-party storage vendors through the CSI. For single-node clusters, the hostPath volume attaches PODs directly to a node’s file system, facilitating development and testing. This article has already been published on https://blog.mayadata.io/the-importance-of-persistent-storage-in-kubernetes-mayadata-openebs and has been authorized by MayaData for a republish.

Quickly learn how to set up ActiveMQ Artemis on your Windows OS machine. ActiveMQ Artemis is an open-source project for asynchronous messaging systems.

Migrate from Protractor to other alternative tools Cypress, WebdriverIO, or Testcafe.

In this blog, we look at some of the most sought-out open source projects in the areas of monitoring, deployment, and maintenance.

In this article, we introduce Deep Learning Graphs and go through 7 up-and-coming open-source libraries for graph deep learning, ranked in order of increasing popularity.

When looking for an automation programming language, you have plenty of options — look no further than this list for the perfect language for your use case.

In this world of cross-functional teams and microservice architecture, DevOps skills become increasingly important. Learn about continuous integration, continuous delivery, continuous deployment, and more.

Getting Spinnaker running is not an easy feat, but Armory's Minnaker open source application gets you started in 10 minutes!

The serverless development model is now a requirement for enterprises that want to spin up their business applications on-demand rather than running them all the time.

How to create gorgeous documentation using GitBook — and why you should use the platform for your next project.