Delta, Hudi, and Iceberg: The Data Lakehouse Trifecta
Get a detailed overview of Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg as we discuss their data storage, processing capabilities, and deployment options.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeAs data becomes increasingly important for businesses, the need for scalable, efficient, and cost-effective data storage and processing solutions is more critical than ever. Data Lakehouses have emerged as a powerful tool to help organizations harness the benefits of both Data Lakes and Data Warehouses. In the first article, we highlighted key benefits of Data Lakehouses for businesses, while the second article delved into the architectural details.
In this article, we will focus on three popular Data Lakehouse solutions: Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg. We will explore the key features, strengths, and weaknesses of each solution to help you make an informed decision about the best fit for your organization's data management needs.
Data Lakehouse Innovations: Exploring the Genesis and Features of Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg
The three Data Lakehouse solutions we will discuss in this article — Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg — have all emerged to address the challenges of managing massive amounts of data and providing efficient query performance for big data workloads. Although they share some common goals and characteristics, each solution has its unique features, strengths, and weaknesses.
Delta Lake was created by Databricks and is built on top of Apache Spark, a popular distributed computing system for big data processing. It was designed to bring ACID transactions, scalable metadata handling, and unification of batch and streaming data processing to Data Lakes. Delta Lake has quickly gained traction in the big data community due to its compatibility with a wide range of data platforms and tools, as well as its seamless integration with the Apache Spark ecosystem.
Apache Hudi (Hadoop Upserts Deletes and Incrementals) is an open-source project developed by Uber to efficiently manage large-scale analytical datasets on Hadoop-compatible distributed storage systems. Hudi provides upserts and incremental processing capabilities to handle real-time data ingestion, allowing for faster data processing and improved query performance. With its flexible storage and indexing mechanisms, Hudi supports a wide range of analytical workloads and data processing pipelines.
Apache Iceberg is an open table format for large-scale, high-performance data management, initially developed by Netflix. Iceberg aims to provide a more robust and efficient foundation for data lake storage, addressing the limitations of existing storage solutions like Apache Hive and Apache Parquet. One of its most significant innovations is the use of a flexible and powerful schema evolution mechanism, which allows users to evolve table schema without rewriting existing data. Iceberg also focuses on improving metadata management, making it scalable and efficient for very large datasets.
Each of these solutions has evolved in response to specific needs and challenges in the big data landscape, and they all bring valuable innovations to the Data Lakehouse concept. In the following sections, we will delve into the technical aspects of each solution, examining their data storage and file formats, data versioning and history, data processing capabilities, query performance optimizations, and the technologies and infrastructure required for their deployment.
Navigating Delta Lake: Key Aspects of Data Storage, Processing, and Access
Delta Lake employs the open-source Parquet file format, a columnar storage format optimized for analytical workloads. It enhances the format by introducing an ACID transaction log, which maintains a record of all operations performed on the dataset. This transaction log, combined with the file storage structure, ensures reliability and consistency in the data.
Data versioning and history are essential aspects of Delta Lake, enabling users to track changes and roll back to previous versions if necessary. The transaction log records every operation, thus providing a historical view of the data and allowing for time-travel queries.
Delta Lake ensures efficient query performance by implementing various optimization techniques. One such technique is data compaction, which combines small files into larger ones to improve read performance. Furthermore, it employs a mechanism called Z-Ordering to optimize the organization of data on disk, which reduces the amount of data read during queries.
For data access, Delta Lake provides a simple and unified API to read and query data from the tables. You can use time-travel queries to access historical versions of your data or perform complex analytical operations using the supported query engines.
To store data in Delta Lake format, data must first be processed and saved in the appropriate file format. Here's an example code snippet for writing data to a Delta Lake table using Apache Spark with following reading:
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
spark = SparkSession.builder \
.appName("Delta Lake Write and Read Example") \
.config("spark.jars.packages", "io.delta:delta-core_2.12:2.3.0") \
.getOrCreate()
# Read data from a source, e.g., a CSV file
data = spark.read.format("csv").load("/path/to/csv-file")
# Write data to a Delta Lake table
data.write.format("delta") \
.mode("overwrite") \
.save("/path/to/delta-lake-table")
# Read data from the Delta Lake table
delta_data = spark.read.format("delta") \
.load("/path/to/delta-lake-table")
# Perform some transformations and actions on the data
result = delta_data.filter("some_condition").groupBy("some_column").count()
result.show()
In the code snippet above, we use the "delta" format to write and read data to and from a Delta Lake table. The Delta Lake library is included in the Spark session by adding the "io.delta:delta-core_2.12:2.3.0" package to the "spark.jars.packages" configuration.
Delta Lake supports a wide range of query engines, including Apache Spark, Databricks Runtime, and Presto. It also provides APIs for programming languages such as Scala, Python, SQL, and Java, enabling seamless integration with existing data processing pipelines.
Delta Lake integrates with various data platforms and tools, such as Apache Hive, Apache Flink, and Apache Kafka. In terms of deployment, it can be utilized in on-premises environments, as well as in cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP. For storage, Delta Lake can work with distributed file systems like HDFS or cloud-based storage services such as Amazon S3, Azure Data Lake Storage, and Google Cloud Storage.
Data Management in Apache Hudi: Exploring Its Core Components
Apache Hudi is another powerful Data Lakehouse solution that provides efficient data storage and querying capabilities. Like Delta Lake, it also uses Parquet as its underlying file format and adds a transaction log for ACID compliance. Hudi's storage management system enables upserts, incremental processing, and rollback support, allowing for efficient data ingestion and access.
One of the key aspects of Apache Hudi is its built-in support for data partitioning, which helps optimize query performance by reducing the amount of data scanned during query execution. Hudi also provides a mechanism called "indexing" to enable fast record-level lookups, updates, and deletes.
Hudi supports various query engines, including Apache Spark, Apache Hive, and Presto, and offers APIs for languages like Scala, Python, SQL, and Java. This flexibility ensures seamless integration with your existing data processing infrastructure.
To write and read data using Apache Hudi, you can use the following code snippet:
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
spark = SparkSession.builder \
.appName("Apache Hudi Write and Read Example") \
.config("spark.jars", "path/to/hudi-spark-bundle.jar") \
.getOrCreate()
# Read data from a source, e.g., a CSV file
data = spark.read.format("csv").load("/path/to/csv-file")
# Write data to an Apache Hudi table
data.write.format("org.apache.hudi") \
.options(get_hudi_options()) \
.mode("overwrite") \
.save("/path/to/hudi-table")
# Read data from the Apache Hudi table
hudi_data = spark.read.format("org.apache.hudi") \
.load("/path/to/hudi-table/*")
# Perform some transformations and actions on the data
result = hudi_data.filter("some_condition").groupBy("some_column").count()
result.show()
In the example above, the "org.apache.hudi" format is specified for writing data to an Apache Hudi table. The required Hudi library is added to the Spark session by specifying the "hudi-spark-bundle.jar" path in the "spark.jars" configuration.
Apache Iceberg Basics: A Journey Through Data Management Fundamentals
Apache Iceberg is a relatively new addition to the Data Lakehouse landscape. It is an open table format that provides strong consistency, snapshot isolation, and efficient query performance. Like Delta Lake and Apache Hudi, Iceberg also uses Parquet as its underlying file format and builds additional features on top of it.
Iceberg's schema evolution mechanism is one of its most significant innovations. It allows users to evolve table schema without the need to rewrite existing data. This capability makes it possible to add, delete, or update columns in a table while preserving the existing data layout.
Another key aspect of Iceberg is its scalable and efficient metadata management system. It uses a combination of manifest files and metadata tables to store information about table data, making it easier to manage large datasets. Iceberg optimizes query performance by employing techniques like predicate pushdown, which reduces the amount of data read during query execution.
Iceberg supports a variety of query engines, including Apache Spark, Apache Flink, and Trino (formerly known as PrestoSQL). It also provides APIs for programming languages such as Scala, Python, SQL, and Java, ensuring seamless integration with your existing data processing infrastructure.
To write and read data using Apache Iceberg, you can use the following code snippet:
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
spark = SparkSession.builder \
.appName("Apache Iceberg Write and Read Demonstration") \
.config("spark.jars.packages", "org.apache.iceberg:iceberg-spark3-runtime:0.13.2") \
.getOrCreate()
# Load data from a source, such as a CSV file
data = spark.read.format("csv").load("/path/to/csv-file")
# Write data to an Apache Iceberg table
data.write.format("iceberg") \
.mode("overwrite") \
.save("iceberg_catalog_namespace.table_name")
# Load data from the Apache Iceberg table
iceberg_data = spark.read.format("iceberg") \
.load("iceberg_catalog_namespace.table_name")
# Apply transformations and actions to the data
result = iceberg_data.filter("some_condition").groupBy("some_column").count()
result.show()
In the example above, the "iceberg" format is specified for writing data to an Apache Iceberg table. The Iceberg library is included in the Spark session by adding the "org.apache.iceberg:iceberg-spark3-runtime:0.13.2" package to the "spark.jars.packages" configuration.
Iceberg can be deployed in on-premises environments or cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP. It supports various storage systems, including distributed file systems like HDFS and cloud-based storage services such as Amazon S3, Azure Data Lake Storage, and Google Cloud Storage.
Weighing the Pros and Cons: Analyzing Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg
To help you make an informed decision about which Data Lakehouse solution is best for your organization, we have compared the features of Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg using a set of factors. In the table below, each factor is evaluated as supported (+), unsupported (-), or partly supported (±).
CRITERION |
DELTA LAKE |
APACHE HUDI |
APACHE ICEBERG |
ACID Transactions |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Schema Evolution |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Time Travel (Data Versioning) |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Data Partitioning |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Upserts and Deletes |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Incremental Processing |
+ |
+ |
+- |
Data Deduplication |
+- |
+ |
+- |
Metadata Scalability |
+ |
+- |
+ |
Compaction Management |
+- |
+ |
+ |
Merge on Read and Copy on Write Storage |
- |
+ |
- |
Query Optimization Techniques |
+ |
+- |
+ |
Support for Multiple Query Engines |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Integration with Other Data Platforms and Tools |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Cloud-native Storage Compatibility |
+ |
+ |
+ |
Ease of Deployment and Management |
+ |
+- |
+ |
This table provides a high-level comparison of the features supported by Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg. It is important to note that each solution has its unique strengths and trade-offs, and the best choice for a specific use case depends on the organization's requirements, existing infrastructure, and familiarity with the technologies involved.
Summing Up the Data Lakehouse Landscape: Key Insights and Analysis
In conclusion, the Data Lakehouse concept has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges of traditional data warehouses and data lakes, providing a unified platform for scalable, reliable, and efficient data management. As organizations strive to harness the power of their data, selecting the right Data Lakehouse solution becomes crucial for optimizing performance and adaptability.
Throughout this comparison, we have examined the key aspects of three prominent Data Lakehouse solutions: Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg. Each of these solutions has its unique strengths and trade-offs, catering to a variety of use cases and requirements. By assessing their data storage, processing, and access capabilities, as well as their integration with existing technologies and infrastructure, organizations can make informed decisions on which solution best aligns with their needs.
While the comparison table highlights the high-level differences between Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg, it is essential to consider the specific requirements and constraints of each organization. Factors such as ease of deployment, compatibility with current infrastructure, and familiarity with the underlying technologies can significantly impact the success of a Data Lakehouse implementation.
In our next article, we will delve deeper into the technologies used for implementing Data Lakehouses, exploring the underlying mechanisms, tools, and best practices that can help organizations optimize their data management strategies.
Ultimately, the choice between Delta Lake, Apache Hudi, and Apache Iceberg will depend on a careful evaluation of their respective features, trade-offs, and alignment with the organization's objectives. By thoroughly understanding the capabilities of each solution, organizations can ensure a future-proof Data Lakehouse infrastructure that facilitates data-driven decision-making and unlocks new insights to drive business growth.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Comments