NetBeans IDE 7.3.1 is an update to NetBeans IDE 7.3 and includes the following highlights: Support for Java EE 7 development Deployment to GlassFish 4 Support for major Java EE 7 specifications: JSF 2.2, JPA 2.1, JAX-RS 2.0, WebSocket 1.0 and more Support for WebLogic 12.1.2 and JBoss 7.x Integration of recent patches There are two ways to get the recent changes: To use the new Java EE 7 support, it is recommended to download and install NetBeans IDE 7.3.1. To get only the integration of recent patches: Launch your current installation of NetBeans IDE 7.3. An update notification will appear in the IDE. Click the notification box to install the updates. OR to perform the update manually, in the IDE select Help-->Check for Updates. NetBeans IDE 7.3.1 is available in English, Brazilian Portuguese, Japanese, Russian, and Simplified Chinese.

RPC/encoded is a vestige from before SOAP objects were defined with XML Schema. It’s not widely supported anymore. You will need to generate the stubs using Apache Axis 1.0, which is from the same era. java org.apache.axis.wsdl.WSDL2Java http://someurl?WSDL You will need the following jars or equivalents in the -cp classpath param: axis-1.4.jar commons-logging-1.1.ja commons-discovery-0.2.jar jaxrpc-1.1.jar saaj-1.1.jar wsdl4j-1.4.jar activation-1.1.jar mail-1.4.jar This will generate similar stubs to wsimport. Alternatively, if you are not using the parts of the schema that require rpc/encoded, you can download a copy of the WSDL and comment out those bits. Then run wsimport against the local file. If you look at the WSDL, the following bits are using rpc/encoded: Sources 1. http://bitkickers.blogspot.com/2008/12/rpcencoded-web-services-on-java-16.html 2. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/412772/java-rpc-encoded-wsdls-are-not-supported-in-jaxws-2-0

Hadoop provides a Java native API to support file system operations..

With the release of ASP.NET MVC 4 one of the exciting features packed in the release was ASP.NET Web API.

This post will be for WSO2 ESB Filter Mediator and it will be cover simple usecase with basic Filter Mediator functions. It can be used for XPath filtering of messages. There are two modes of operation Specifies the XPath (boolean expression), return true or false XPath will be matched against the regular expression return true or false Syntax mediator+ Usecase I have services call 'BusService' where I can give rootId (road name) and get list bus number that going on that root. In the same services it have some train deatils also. When client call busService it must give busService and also If client ask for train details rather bus system must give it also. Here is busServices calls request: root1 respond: root1Colombo Negombo Galle getTraingNo request: root1 respond: 12-Colombo 13-Muthu 01-Bange Now I have write simple WSO2 ESB proxy with filter mediator. 1. Download wso2 esb 4.6.0 2. Start wso2 esb /bin/wso2server.bat (offset 1) Other services expose in wso2 AS in offset 0 3. Go to https://localhost:9444/carbon/ 4. Then Create "Pass Through Proxy" 5. Here I am adding WSO2 Filter Mediator Specify As: XPath or a Regular expression. XPath: XPath expression if you selected the "Specify As" option to "XPath". Source: which is going match with the reguilar expression Regex: Regular expression to match with the source value. 6. In Here I am filtering for the action of the WS request and it log the client request is it bus or train request? Here is proxy Source View 6. Go to https://localhost:9444/services/transportProxy?tryit# Make bus request and train request and see console log You can improve this usecase with some WSO2 ESB mediator if you wish!!

apache camel with apache tomcat provides a low-cost and lightweight integration framework. is apache camel with apache tomcat a good fit for your project requirements? apache tomcat is known for it’s ease-of-use and minimal footprint when building servlet and javaserver page applications, while apache camel is known for supporting enterprise integration patterns, routing and mediation rules in a variety of domain-specific languages, including a java-based fluent api, spring or blueprint xml configuration files, and a scala dsl. developers and architects find a straightforward learning curve when using apache camel’s java based dsl, yet they find better tools exist when building simple connections or implementing large integration projects. see kai wahner’s writeup on lightweight frameworks . for larger integration projects requiring reliable messaging, scalability, eventing, business process execution, or web agent hosting, selecting an enterprise service bus provides a better fit . kai has another good article placing esb and integration suites in context. apache camel is often integrated with activemq, servicemix, or fuse to obtain additional capabilities required to deliver medium to complex integration projects. the wso2 esb team is looking to embrace the simplicity of apache camel (by incorporating the project similar to embedding apache cxf ), and extend with multi-tenancy, failover, performance, and scalability enhancements. similar to redhat jboss fuse, wso2 esb delivers service container clustering and reliable failover functions. in addition to extensive mediation primitives, the products provide service monitoring and management support not available in the basic apache camel with apache tomcat combination. to combat server proliferation, wso2 esb inherently supports multi-tenancy. the multi-tenancy goes beyond simple tomcat virtual domains by using osgi class loaders and security managers to provide adequate tenant isolation and separate administration console interfaces. a single wso2 esb instance can support multiple business units with appropriate data, logic, and execution isolation. springsource, mulesoft, and wso2 have extended apache tomcat to provide better server management and ability to install features within the integration platform. wso2 esb can install over 100+ features (e.g. business process execution, complex event execution, business activity monitoring) into the integration platform. from a performance perspective, apache camel with apache tomcat depends on the tomcat transport to provide high performant message transfer. the wso2 esb pass through transport and binary relay transports are optimized to provide the best streaming, non-blocking performance by tightly integrating the transport and mediation layers. camel + tomcat depends on what ever the tomcat transport support but i believe esb pt and nhttp transports are preforming efficiently here but i also don’t have any reference. if you install apache camel on top of apache tomcat then you are not going to get the same performance and scalability. the latest esb performance benchmarks are posted for reference and replication.

This blog does not try to compare all available Web Services Development Frameworks but focuses only on three popular approaches

This tutorial runs through a method for building a Java web service in Eclipse using Apache Tomcat and Apache Axis. The process takes under ten minutes.

I recently stumbled upon an article Synchronising Multithreaded Integration Tests on Captain Debug's Blog. That post emphasizes the problem of designing integration tests involving class under test running business logic asynchronously. This contrived example was given (I stripped some comments): public class ThreadWrapper { public void doWork() { Thread thread = new Thread() { @Override public void run() { System.out.println("Start of the thread"); addDataToDB(); System.out.println("End of the thread method"); } private void addDataToDB() { // Dummy Code... try { Thread.sleep(4000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } }; thread.start(); System.out.println("Off and running..."); } } This is only an example of common pattern where business logic is delegated to some asynchronous job pool we have no control over. Roger Hughes (the author) enumerates few techniques of testing such code, including: arbitrary ("long enough") sleep() in test method to make sure background logic finishes refactoring doWork() so that it accepts CountDownLatch and agrees to notify it when job is done making the method above package private and @VisibleForTesting only "The" solution - refactoring doWork() so that it accepts arbitrary Runnable. In test we can wrap this Runnable (decorator pattern) and wait for inner Runnable to complete Last solution is not bad but it changes the responsibilities of ThreadWrapper significantly. Now it's up to the caller to decide what kind of job should be executed asynchronously while previously ThreadWrapper was encapsulating business logic completely. I am not saying it's a bad design, but it's drastically different from original method. Awaitility Can we write a test without such a massive refactoring? First solution involves handy library called Awaitility. This library is not a silver bullet, it simply evaluates given condition periodically and makes sure it's fulfilled within given time. It's the kind of code you probably wrote once or twice - wrapped in a library with well designed API. So here is our initial approach: import static com.jayway.awaitility.Awaitility.await; import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS; //... await().atMost(10, SECONDS).until(recordInserted()); //... private Callable recordInserted() { return new Callable() { @Override public Boolean call() throws Exception { return dataExists(); } }; } I think there is nothing to explain here. dataExists() is simply a boolean method that initially returns false but will eventually return true once the background task (addDataToDB()) is done. In other words we assume that background task introduces some side effect and dataExists() can detect that side effect. BTW I happened to have JDK 8 with Lambda support installed and IntelliJ IDEA gives me this nice tooltip: Suddenly I get this Java 8-compatible alternative suggested: private Callable recordInserted() { return () -> dataExists(); } But there's more: Which transforms my code to: private Callable recordInserted() { return this::dataExists; } this:: prefix means that recordInsterted is a method of current object. Just as well we can say someDao::dataExists. Simply put this syntax turns method into a function object we can pass around (this process is called eta expansion in Scala). By now recordInsterted() method is no longer that needed so I can inline it and remove it completely: await().atMost(10, SECONDS).until(this::dataExists); I am not sure what I love more - the new lambda syntax or how IntelliJ IDEA takes pre-Java 8 code and retrofits it for me automatically (well, it's still a bit experimental, just reported IDEA-106670). I can run this intention in IntelliJ project-wide, Lambda-enabling my whole code base in seconds. Sweet! But back to original problem. Awaitility helps a lot by providing decent API and some handy features. I use it extensively in combination with FluentLenium. But periodically polling for state changes feels a bit like a workaround and still introduces minimal latency. But notice that running and synchronizing on asynchronous tasks is quite common and JDK already provides necessary facilities: Future abstraction! java.util.concurrent.Future To limit the scope of refactoring I will leave the original new Thread() approach for now and use SettableFuture from Guava. It is a Future implementation that allows triggering completion or failure at any time, from any thread (see DeferredResult - asynchronous processing in Spring MVC for more advanced usage). As you can see the changes are quite small: public class ThreadWrapper { public ListenableFuture doWork() { final SettableFuture future = SettableFuture.create(); Thread thread = new Thread() { @Override public void run() { addDataToDB() //... //last instruction future.set(null); } private void addDataToDB() { // Dummy Code... // ... } }; thread.start(); return future; } } doWork() now returns ListenableFuture with lifecycle controlled inside asynchronous task. We use Void but in reality you might want to return some asynchronous result instead. future.set(null) invocation in the end is crucial. It signals that future is fulfilled and all threads waiting for that future will be notified. Once again, in practice you would use e.g. Future and then instead of null we would say future.set(someInteger). Here null is just a placeholder for Void type. How does this help us? Test code can now rely on future completion: final ListenableFuture future = wrapper.doWork(); future.get(10, SECONDS); future.get() blocks until future is done (with timeout), i.e. until we call future.set(...). BTW I use ListenableFuture from Guava but Java 8 introduces equivalent and standard CompletableFuture - I will write about it soon. So, we are getting somewhere. Future is a useful abstraction for waiting and signalling completion of background jobs. But there is also one immense advantage of Future which are not taking, ekhm, advantage from - exception handling and propagation. Future.get() will block until future is complete and return asynchronous result or throw an exception initially thrown from our job. This is really useful for asynchronous tests. Currently if Thread.run() throws an exception it may or may not be logged or visible to us and future will never be completed. With Awaitility it's slightly better - it will timeout without any meaningful reason, which have to be tracked down manually in console/logs. But with minor modification our test is much more verbose: public void run() { try { addDataToDB() //... future.set(null); } catch (Exception e) { future.setException(e); } } If some exception occurs in asynchronous job, it will pop-up and be shown as JUnit/TestNG failure reason. (Listening)ExecutorService That's it. If addDataToDB() throws an exception it will not be lost. Instead our future.get() in test will re-throw that exception for us. Our test won't simply timeout leaving us with no clue what went wrong. Great, but do we really have to create this special SettableFuture instance, can't we just use existing libraries that already give us Future with correct underlying implementation? Of course! By this requires further refactoring: import com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListeningExecutorService; import com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.util.concurrent.Future; public class ThreadWrapper { private final ListeningExecutorService executorService = MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator( Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor() ); public ListenableFuture doWork() { Runnable job = new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { //... } }; return executorService.submit(job); } } This is what you've all been waiting for. Don't start new Thread all the time, use thread pool! I actually went one step further by using ListeningExecutorService - an extension to ExecutorService that returns ListenableFuture instances (see why you want that). But the solution doesn't require this, I just spread good practices. As you can see Future instance is now created and managed for us. The test is exactly the same but production code is cleaner and more robust. MoreExecutors.sameThreadExecutor() The final trick I want to show you involves dependency injection. First let's externalize the creation of a thread pool from ThreadWrapper class: private final ListeningExecutorService executorService; public ThreadWrapper() { this(Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor()); } public ThreadWrapper(ExecutorService executorService) { this.executorService = MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executorService); } We can now optionally supply custom ExecutorService. This is good for various other reasons, but for us it opens brand new testing opportunity: MoreExecutors.sameThreadExecutor(). This time we modify our test slightly: final ThreadWrapper wrapper = new ThreadWrapper(MoreExecutors.sameThreadExecutor()); wrapper.doWork().get(); See how we pass custom ExecutorService? It's a very special implementation that doesn't really maintain thread pool of any kind. Every time you submit() some task to that "pool" it will be executed in the same thread in a blocking manner. This means that we no longer have asynchronous test, even though the production code wasn't changed that much! wrapper.doWork() will block until "background" job finishes. The extra call to get() is still needed to make sure exceptions are propagated, but is guaranteed to never block (because the job is already done). Using the same thread to execute asynchronous task instead of a thread pool might have an unexpected results if you somehow depend on thread-based properties, e.g. transactions, security, ThreadLocal. However if you use standard ThreadPoolExecutor with CallerRunsPolicy, JDK already behaves this way if thread pool is overflowed. So it's not that unusual. Summary Testing asynchronous code is hard, but you have options. Several options. But one conclusion that strikes me is the side effect of our efforts. We refactored original code in order to make it testable. But the final production code is not only testable, but also much better structured and robust. Surprisingly it's even source-code compatible with previous version as we barely changed return type from void to Future. It seems to be a rule - testable code is often better designed and implemented. Unit test is the first client code using our library. It naturally forces us to to think more about consumers, not the implementation.

Publish/Subscribe is a simple messaging pattern where a publisher sends messages to a channel without the knowledge of who is going to receive them. Then it is the responsibility of the channel to deliver a copy of the messages to each subscriber. This messaging model enables creation of loosely coupled and scalable systems. It is a very common messaging pattern and there are so many ways to create a kind of pub-sub in Apache Camel. But bear in mind that they are all different and have different characteristics. From the simplest to more complex, here is a list: Multicast - works only with a static list of subscribers, can deliver the message to subscriber in parallel, stops or continues on exception if one of the subscribers fails. Recipient List - it is similar to multicast, but allows the subscribers to be defined at run time, for example in the message header. SEDA - this component provides asynchronous SEDA behaviour using BlockingQueue. When multipleConsumers option is set, it can be used for asynchronous pub-sub messaging. It also has possibilities to block when full, set queue size or time out publishing if the message is not consumed on time. VM - same as SEDA, but works cross multiple CamelContexts, as long as they are in the same JMV. It is a nice mechanism for sending messages between webapps in a web-container or bundles in OSGI container. Spring-redis - Redis has pubsub feature which allows publishing messages to multiple receivers. It is possible to subscribe to a channel by name or using pattern-matching. When pattern-matching is used, the subscriber will receive messages from all the channels matching the pattern. Keep in mind that in this case it is possible to receive a message more than once, if the multiple patterns matches the same channel where the message was sent. JMS (ActiveMQ) - that's probably the best know way for doing pub-sub including durable subscriptions. For a complete list of features check ActiveMQ website. Amazon SNS/SQS - if you need a really scalable and reliable solution, SNS is the way to go. Subscribing a SQS queue to the topic, turns it into a durable subscriber and allows polling the messages later. The important point to remember in this case is that it is not very fast and most importantly, Amazon doesn't guarantee FIFO order for your messages. There are also less popular Camel components which offer publish-subscribe messaging model: websocket - it uses Eclipse Jetty Server and can sends message to all clients which are currently connected. hazelcast - SEDA implements a work-queue in order to support asynchronous SEDA architectures. guava-eventbus - integration bridge between Camel and Google Guava EventBus infrastructure. spring-event - provides access to the Spring ApplicationEvent objects. eventadmin - on OSGi environment to receive OSGI events. xmpp - implements XMPP (Jabber) transport. Posting a message in chat room is also pub-sub;) mqtt - for communicating with MQTT compliant message brokers. amqp - supports the AMQP protocol using the Client API of the Qpid project. javaspace - a transport for working with any JavaSpace compliant implementation. Can you name any other way for doing publish-subscribe?

Yo probably format your code often by pressing Ctrl+Shift+F or right clicking Source -> Format. This function is also provide in JDT, so you can also format your Java code in code. However finding correct class to do this function is not straight-forward, because one of them is a internal class. The following is the code to format Java code by using DefaultCodeFormatter. import org.eclipse.jdt.core.ToolFactory; import org.eclipse.jdt.core.formatter.CodeFormatter; import org.eclipse.jface.text.BadLocationException; import org.eclipse.jface.text.Document; import org.eclipse.jface.text.IDocument; import org.eclipse.text.edits.MalformedTreeException; import org.eclipse.text.edits.TextEdit; public class FormatterTest { public static void main(String[] args) { String code = "public class TestFormatter{public static void main(String[] args){System.out.println(\"Hello World\");}"; CodeFormatter codeFormatter = ToolFactory.createCodeFormatter(null); TextEdit textEdit = codeFormatter.format(CodeFormatter.K_COMPILATION_UNIT, code, 0, code.length(), 0, null); IDocument doc = new Document(code); try { textEdit.apply(doc); System.out.println(doc.get()); } catch (MalformedTreeException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } catch (BadLocationException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } he apply() method in TextEdit class is the key to this problem. It applies the edit tree rooted by this edit to the GIVEN document. Output in console: Depending on your Eclipse version, you will need the following jar files: org.eclipse.core.contenttype_3.4.1.R35x_v20090826-0451.jar org.eclipse.core.jobs_3.4.100.v20090429-1800.jar org.eclipse.core.resources_3.5.2.R35x_v20091203-1235.jar org.eclipse.equinox.common_3.5.1.R35x_v20090807-1100.jar org.eclipse.equinox.preferences_3.2.301.R35x_v20091117.jar org.eclipse.jdt.core_3.5.2.v_981_R35x.jar org.eclipse.osgi_3.5.2.R35x_v20100126.jar org.eclipse.text_3.5.101.v20110928-1504.jar org.eclipse.core.runtime_3.5.0.v20090525.jar

There are several good ways to upload content to an S3 bucket in the Java world – in this article we’ll look at what the jclouds library provides for this purpose. To use jclouds – specifically the APIs discussed in this article, this simple Maven dependency should be added to the pom of the project: org.jclouds jclouds-allblobstore 1.5.9 1. Uploading to Amazon S3 The first step, in order to access any of these APIs, is to create a BlobStoreContext: BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder("aws-s3").credentials(identity, credentials) .buildView(BlobStoreContext.class); This represents the entry-point to a general key-value storage service, such as Amazon S3 – but not limited to it. For the more specific S3 only implementation, the context can be created similarly: BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder("aws-s3").credentials(identity, credentials) .buildView(S3BlobStoreContext.class); And even more specifically: BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder("aws-s3").credentials(identity, credentials) .buildView(AWSS3BlobStoreContext.class); When the authenticated context is no longer needed, closing it is required to release all resources – threads and connections – associated to it. 2. The four S3 APIs of jclouds The jclouds library provides four different APIs to upload content to S3 bucket, ranging from simple but inflexible to complex and powerful, all obtained via the BlobStoreContext. Let’s start with the simplest. 2.1. Upload via the Map API The easiest way jclouds can be used to interact with an S3 bucket is by representing that bucket as a Map. The API is obtained from the context: InputStreamMap bucket = context.createInputStreamMap("bucketName"); Then, to upload a simple HTML file: bucket.putString("index1.html", "hello world1"); The InputStreamMap API exposes several other types of PUT operations – files, raw bytes – both for single and bulk. A simple integration test can be used as an example: @Test public void whenFileIsUploadedToS3WithMapApi_thenNoExceptions() { BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder("aws-s3").credentials(identity, credentials) .buildView(AWSS3BlobStoreContext.class); InputStreamMap bucket = context.createInputStreamMap("bucketName"); bucket.putString("index1.html", "hello world1"); context.close(); } 2.2. Upload via BlobMap Using the simple Map API is straightforward but ultimately limited – for example, there is no way to pass in metadata about the content being uploaded. When more flexibility and customization is necessary, this simplified approach to uploading data to S3 via a Map is no longer enough. The next API we’ll look at is the Blob Map API – this is obtained from the context: BlobMap bucket = context.createBlobMap("bucketName"); The API allows the client to access more lower level details, such as Content-Length, Content-Type, Content-Encoding, eTag hash and others; to upload new content in the bucket: Blob blob = bucket.blobBuilder().name("index2.html"). payload("hello world2"). contentType("text/html").calculateMD5().build(); The API also allows setting a variety of payloads on the create request. A simple integration test for uploading a basic HTML file to S3 via the Blob Map API: @Test public void whenFileIsUploadedToS3WithBlobMap_thenNoExceptions() throws IOException { BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder("aws-s3").credentials(identity, credentials) .buildView(AWSS3BlobStoreContext.class); BlobMap bucket = context.createBlobMap("bucketName"); Blob blob = bucket.blobBuilder().name("index2.html"). payload("hello world2"). contentType("text/html").calculateMD5().build(); bucket.put(blob.getMetadata().getName(), blob); context.close(); } 2.3. Upload via BlobStore The previous APIs had no way to upload content using multipart upload – this makes them ill suited when working with large files. This limitation is addressed by the next API we’re going to look at – the synchronous BlobStore API. This is obtained from the context: BlobStore blobStore = context.getBlobStore(); To use the multipart support and upload a file to S3: Blob blob = blobStore.blobBuilder("index3.html"). payload("hello world3").contentType("text/html").build(); blobStore.putBlob("bucketName", blob, PutOptions.Builder.multipart()); The payload builder is the same one that was being used by the BlobMap API, so the same flexibility in specifying lower level metadata information about the blob is available here. The difference is the PutOptions supported by the PUT operation of the API – namely the multipart support. The previous integration test now has multipart enabled: @Test public void whenFileIsUploadedToS3WithBlobStore_thenNoExceptions() { BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder("aws-s3").credentials(identity, credentials) .buildView(AWSS3BlobStoreContext.class); BlobStore blobStore = context.getBlobStore(); Blob blob = blobStore.blobBuilder("index3.html"). payload("hello world3").contentType("text/html").build(); blobStore.putBlob("bucketName", blob, PutOptions.Builder.multipart()); context.close(); } 2.4. Upload via AsyncBlobStore While the previous BlobStore API was synchronous, there is also an asynchronous API for BlobStore – AsyncBlobStore. The API is similarly obtained from the context: AsyncBlobStore blobStore = context.getAsyncBlobStore(); The only difference between the two is that the async API is returning ListenableFuture for the PUT asynchronous operation: Blob blob = blobStore.blobBuilder("index4.html"). .payload("hello world4").build(); blobStore.putBlob("bucketName", blob).get(); The integration test displaying this operation is similar to the synchronous one: @Test public void whenFileIsUploadedToS3WithBlobStore_thenNoExceptions() { BlobStoreContext context = ContextBuilder.newBuilder("aws-s3").credentials(identity, credentials) .buildView(AWSS3BlobStoreContext.class); BlobStore blobStore = context.getBlobStore(); Blob blob = blobStore.blobBuilder("index4.html"). payload("hello world4").contentType("text/html").build(); Future putOp = blobStore.putBlob("bucketName", blob, PutOptions.Builder.multipart()); putOp.get(); context.close(); } 3. Conclusion In this article, we analysed the four APIs that the jclouds library provides to upload content to Amazon S3. These four APIs are generic and they work with other key-value storage services as well – such as Microsoft Azure Storage for example. In the next article we’ll look at the Amazon specific S3 API available in jclouds – the AWSS3Client. We’ll implement the operation of uploading a large file, dynamically calculate the optimal number of parts for any given file, and perform the upload of all parts in parallel. P.S. You might dig following me on Twitter.

it happens to me many times: i’m stepping with the debugger through my code, and ups! i made one step too far! debugging, and made one step over too far what now? restart the whole debugging session? actually, there is a way to go ‘backwards’ gdb has a ‘reverse debugging’ feature, described here . i’m using the eclipse based codewarrior debugger, and this debug engine is not using gdb. the codewarrior debugger in mcu10.3 supports an eclipse feature: i select a code line in the editor view and use move to line : move to line what it does: it changes the current pc (program counter) of the program to that line: performed move to line now i can continue debugging from that line, e.g. stepping into that function call. yes, this is not true backward debugging. but it is simple and very effective. to perform true backward stepping, the debugger would need to reverse all operations, typically with a rather heavy state machine and data recording. but for the usual case where i simply need to go back a few lines, the ‘move to line’ is perfect. of course there are a few points to consider: this only changes the program counter. any variable changes/etc are not affected or reverted. in case of highly optimized code, there might be multiple sequence points per source line. so doing this for highly optimized code might not work correctly. it works ok within a function. it is not recommended to use it e.g. to set the pc outside of a function. because the context/stack frame is not set up. i use the ‘move to line’ frequently to ‘advance’ the program execution. e.g. to bypass some long sequences i’m not interested in, or to get out of an ‘endless’ loop. the same ‘move to line’ as available while doing assembly stepping too. see this post for details. happy line moving

ActiveMQ is one of the most popular messaging frameworks. For sure the most popular open source framework. Many people think that ActiveMQ works only with Java and this is not true at all. ActiveMQ can work with almost every popular language (including JavaScript!) through numerous protocols which it supports. Today I will show you how to use ActiveMQ in .NET-based solutions. Project setup Using VS 2010's Extension Manger I installed NuGet Package Manager. After installation and VS 2010 restart, I created a project called ActiveMQNMS. I right-clicked it and selected "Manage NuGet packages...". In the search field I typed: "ActiveMQ". There was a package called Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ. I installed it. (Note: ActiveMQ has one dependency - Apache.NMS package. The NMS package provides a unified API for working with different messaging frameworks and providers.) Starting ActiveMQ I already had ActiveMQ installed on my machine. If you don't have one, download it from http://activemq.apache.org. The default instance listens on 61616 port. However, mine is listening on 62626. If you want to run my code, please remember to change the port. To start ActiveMQ I executed: activemq-5.5.0\bin\activemq Depending on configured ports, you can use ActiveMQ web console to manage your queues, topics, subscribers, connections, embedded Apache Camel, etc. I'm using 8282 port, and the console URL is: http://localhost:8282/admin. Test stub In general the .NET API is almost a copy of the Java API. So if you're familiar with JMS and/or ActiveMQ you don't need any documentation. Please note TestIntialize and TestCleanup methods. using System; using Apache.NMS; using Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ; using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting; namespace ActiveMQNMS { [Serializable] public class Person { public string FirstName { get; set; } public string LastName { get; set; } } [TestClass] public class ActiveMqTest { private IConnection _connection; private ISession _session; private const String QUEUE_DESTINATION = "DotNet.ActiveMQ.Test.Queue"; [TestInitialize] public void TestInitialize() { IConnectionFactory factory = new ConnectionFactory("tcp://localhost:62626"); _connection = factory.CreateConnection(); _connection.Start(); _session = _connection.CreateSession(); } [TestCleanup] public void TestCleanup() { _session.Close(); _connection.Close(); } } } Writing Producer Here is the producer: [TestMethod] public void TestA() { IDestination dest = _session.GetQueue(QUEUE_DESTINATION); using (IMessageProducer producer = _session.CreateProducer(dest)) { var person = new Person { FirstName = "Łukasz", LastName = "Budnik" }; var objectMessage = producer.CreateObjectMessage(person); producer.Send(objectMessage); } } Run the test and refresh "Queues" list in ActiveMQ web console. You should see DotNet.ActiveMQ.Test.Queue queue with 1 enqueued and pending message. Purge the queue by hitting the purge link or you simply delete it. Writing Consumer Now we have to consume the message. Here is the code: [TestMethod] public void TestB() { Person person = null; IDestination dest = _session.GetQueue(QUEUE_DESTINATION); using (IMessageConsumer consumer = _session.CreateConsumer(dest)) { IMessage message; while ((message = consumer.Receive(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(2000))) != null) { var objectMessage = message as IObjectMessage; if (objectMessage != null) { person = objectMessage.Body as Person; if (person != null) { Assert.AreEqual("Łukasz", person.FirstName); Assert.AreEqual("Budnik", person.LastName); } } else { Assert.Fail("Object Message is null"); } } } if (person == null) { Assert.Fail("Person object is null"); } } Run tests. Refresh "Queues" tab in ActiveMQ web console. You should see 1 message enqueued and 1 message dequeued. As expected. Summary That's all. Simple, isn't it? ActiveMQ works very, very nicely with .NET. I have to find some performance comparison for ActiveMQ and MS or pure .C#/NET messaging frameworks. Or maybe you have it? Please share. cheers, Łukasz

SmartSVN is a powerful and easy-to-use graphical client for Apache Subversion. There are several clients for Subversion, but here are just a few reasons you should try SmartSVN: It’s cross-platform – SmartSVN runs on Windows, Linux and Mac OS X, so you can continue using the operating system (OS) that works the best for you. It can also be integrated into your OS, via Mac’s Finder Integration or Windows Shell. Everything you need, out of the box – SmartSVN comes complete with all the tools you need to manage your Subversion projects: Conflict solver – this feature combines the freedom of a general, three-way-merge with the ability to detect and resolve any conflicts that occur during the development lifecycle. File compare – this allows you to make inner-line comparisons and directly edit the compared files. Built-in SSH client – allows users to access servers using the SSH protocol. This security-conscious protocol encrypts every piece of communication between the client and the server, for additional protection. A complete view of your project at a glance – the most important files (such as conflicted, modified or missing files) are placed at the top of the file list. SmartSVN also highlights which directories contain local modifications, which directories have been changed in the repository, and whether individual files have been modified locally or in the central repo. This makes it easy to get a quick overview of the state of your project. Fully customizable – maximize productivity by fine-tuning your SmartSVN installation to suit your particular needs: Change keyboard shortcuts, write your own plugin with the SmartSVN API, group revisions to personalize your display, create Change Sets, and alter the context menus and toolbars to suit you. You can learn more about customizing SmartSVN at our ‘5 Ways to Customize SmartSVN’ blog post. Comprehensive bug tracker support – Trac and JIRA are both fully supported. Multitude of support options – SmartSVN users have access to a range of free support, from refcards to blogsand documentation, the SmartSVN forum and a Twitter account maintained by our open source experts. If you need extra support with your SmartSVN installation, expert email support is included with SmartSVN Professional licenses. Want to learn more about SmartSVN? On April 18th, WANdisco will be be holding a free ‘Introduction to SmartSVN’ webinar covering everything you need to get off to a great start with this popular client: Repository basics Checkouts, working folders, editing files and commits Reporting on changes Simple branching Simple merging This webinar is free so register now.

Application Services Governance is a necessary step towards building a responsive IT organization and achieving business agility. By guiding teams through a streamlined application services development process, Application Services Governance Platforms optimize IT effectiveness, raise software quality, and reduce delivery timeframes. Governance relies on policy, people, process and technology to guide business activity and consistently deliver positive outcomes. Effective governance channels business activity towards the ‘right’ path; by making the right actions the path of least resistance. To efficiently guide teams and demonstrate policy compliance benefits, Application Services Governance Platforms provide policy management, developer portals, repositories, service integration and composition, and business value dashboards. Effective governance encompasses the entire IT solution spanning APIs, services, business processes, data, and application delivery. While most governance solutions focus on web services, leading Application Services Governance Platforms bridge API governance, SOA governance, Cloud deployment governance, data governance, and application delivery governance. Additionally, the governance experience must be tailored for the participant’s project role. Portals may be personalized to present notifications, tasks, actions, and reports suitable for application service creators, publishers, subscribers, consumers, or business managers. Application delivery governance segments participants into developers, quality assurance testers, operations, project managers, and application users. End-user Application Services Governance priorities are evolving toward bridging service governance with API governance, extending application lifecycle management to embrace cloud deployment environments, and focusing on visualizing asset business value. Key governance challenges include meeting mobile application demands, implementing efficient self-service provisioning, right-sizing governance practices (not too heavy or light), and defining appropriate policy tiers. Governance Components To efficiently guide teams and demonstrate policy compliance benefits, Application Services Governance Platforms provide policy management, developer portals, repositories, service integration and composition, and business value dashboards. Figure 1 Application Services Governance Components Policy Management Policy management is used to specify the correct behavior, detail exception thresholds, and define corrective actions or notifications. Leading application services governance platforms deliver advanced policy management by conforming to a flexible architecture, addressing relevant policy categories, and spanning all lifecycle phases. A comprehensive Application Services Governance Platform manages: Design-time Policy Run-time Policy Security Policy Developer access Policy Service and API Lifecycle Management Policy Application Lifecycle Management Policy Within these six broad categories, application services governance commonly encompasses service level policies, usage policies, version policies, subscription policies, and access control policies. Registries serve as policy stores for many types of runtime policies including security policies, lifecycle management workflow policies, API policies, service description, service contracts, service consumption, service usage, service lifecycle management, service level agreements (SLAs) and XACML authorization policies. Leading platforms have built-in support for a number of policy standards including WS-Policy, XACML 3.0, and SCXML. Cloud foundation and cloud middleware components deliver sophisticated run-time policy enforcement for tenant partitioning, service level management, application provisioning, tenant access, and resource management. All run-time infrastructure products should serve as well-integrated policy enforcement points that may delegate policy decisions to external decision points or internally cache and process policy assertions. Identity Management infrastructure components serve as a policy decision point and a policy manager for sophisticated security policies encoded in XACML. The Application Service Governance Platforms use workflow engines to execute governance workflow, present task lists, and manage approvals. Complex Event Processor components can be configured as policy decision points, which use time-based policy pattern matching to evaluate run-time service, message, REST resource, and event traffic. For more information on policy management, read the detailed policy management blog post. Developer Portal and Repository Portals serve as the viewport into policy management, service integration and composition, and business value dashboards. The Application Service Governance portals should deliver an application service governance experience tuned for self-service, on-demand access, and safe API usage. Developer portals are often contextually personalized to fit the project and user’s role. For example, a developer portal may fit the needs of API creators and API publishers who are defining, documenting, and publishing APIs. The portal’s user experience may enable API creators and publishers to monitor, manage, and analyze API usage. A developer portal may also be personalized to deliver a user experience tailored for API consumers. API developers who are consuming APIs can find, explore, subscribe and evaluate APIs. Developer portals are often tuned to facilitate service meta-data and lifecycle management for service creators. Service and integration developers who are consuming services can find and explore services. A developer portal should guide teams toward effective and efficient governance when building service implementation and service consumption code. Advanced developer portals capabilities include overlaying build management governance, test governance (i.e. unit, integration, performance), implementation lifecycle governance, and deployment governance. An Application Services Governance Platform should enable flexible organization, classification & documentation of services, APIs, and any IT asset. Key repository capabilities include governing and managing: Any type of metadata in any structure Service, API, or artifact associations and relationships Schema definitions and namespaces Users and Roles User subscriptions Service level agreements Developer documentation Social taxonomies (e.g. ratings, comments, tags) Implementation artifacts (i.e. code, test cases) Service Integration and Composition Service integration and composition for APIs, web services, or business process are often implemented using tools provided by the run-time infrastructure vendor. Application Services Governance components must integrate into diverse run-time infrastructure containers and development tooling. Synchronizing policy, development artifacts, and deployment packages requires tight integration between design-time tools, development tools, run-time management consoles, and application services governance portals and repositories. Business Value Dashboards To gauge governance effectiveness and enhanced business value, analytic dashboards assess policy compliance, quality of service, service usage, architecture coherence, and team performance. The Application Services Governance platform should capture service tier subscription information, collects usage statistics, and integrate with billing and payment systems that deliver show-back or charge-back reports. Subscription and usage reports help teams understand asset adoption (by version, by service) and usage (by version, by service). By understanding adoption and usage, business owners and architects can intelligently invest future development resources, properly plan infrastructure scale, and rationalize the portfolio. Dashboards also present a service overview, number of services, service lifecycle stage, schema re-use, service dependencies, upgrade impacts, development team productivity, and project progress. Governance Lifecycle Phases API management portals and SOA Governance Registries must work together to keep API lifecycle stages synchronized with backend service implementation stages. An API Governance experience may provide a straightforward set of lifecycle stages (e.g., created, published, deprecated, retired, blocked) that may be customized by the development team. SOA Governance Registries facilitates service metadata management and governance across design, implementation, test, and run-time operations. Figure 2 below depicts the intersection of the two governance views. Figure 2: API and Service Lifecycle Views Application delivery governance usually relies on ad hoc tools and processes, knitted together by end-user delivery managers. Application Services Governance Platforms should span project inception, development, quality assurance, production deployment, production management, maintenance, and retirement. Figure 3 illustrates service implementation activities governed by an application delivery governance product. Figure 3: Implementation activities governed by application services delivery governance Application Services Governance Drivers The IT focus on API, DevOps, and Cloud scale is driving resurgent interest in Application Services Governance. As development teams support mobile applications by fielding web APIs, they are creating a new ‘demand layer’ in front of existing service implementations. Both API and SOA success requires creating loosely coupled consumer-provider connections, enforcing a separation of concerns between consumer and provider, and exposing a set of re-usable, shared services, and gaining service consumer adoption. With traditional SOA Governance, many development teams publish services, yet struggle to create a service architecture that is widely shared, re-used, and adopted across internal development teams. In today’s connected business world, API and SOA are the business. An effective governance approach must address human collaboration stumbling blocks. By publishing managed APIs, establishing API manager and publisher roles, extending the governance registry, facilitating API management practices (e.g self-service key management, self-service provisioning, service tier management, and usage visualization),and offering APIs through developer portal, organizations can overcome collaboration, trust, and adoption hurdles while enhancing SOA success. By publishing managed APIs, establishing API manager and publisher roles, extending the governance registry, and offering APIs through an API Store, team have a new opportunity to increase service re-use and enhance IT business value. For more information on how teams can complement SOA Governance with API Governance, read the promoting services with API Management white paper. Because services are often imbedded in application solutions, leading Application Services Governance platforms wrap services governance inside application delivery governance. When operation team members use traditional point tools (i.e. Puppet, Chef, Jenkins,Selenium) to achieve DevOps benefits, the teams spend a considerable amount of time and effort creating agile workflow, effective governance, seamless activity transitions, and on-demand self-service access. A configurable DevOps PaaS can implement governance best practices and be readily adopted by teams without extensive implementation effort. Effective application delivery governance presents a simplified and unified user experience to complex development tools, processes, and team hand-offs. By integrating software promotion best practices, test automation, continuous integration, and issue tracking, application delivery governance raises software quality while reducing delivery timeframes. For more information, read about how to accelerate agility and maintain governance with DevOps PaaS. Recommended Reading Policy Management for Application Services Governance Application Services Governance Requires More Than a SOA Registry API and SOA Convergence Promoting services with API Management white paper Accelerate agility and maintain governance with DevOps PaaS Governance Registry Brings Integrity to SaaS Platform Gartner’s analysis of WSO2 SOA Governance

The following is a very simple example of event stream processing (using the ESPER engine). Note - a full working example is available over on GitHub: https://github.com/corsoft/esper-demo-nuclear What is Complex Event processing (CEP)? Complex Event Processing (CEP), or Event Stream Stream Processing (ESP) are technologies commonly used in Event-Driven systems. These type of systems consume, and react to a stream of event data in real time. Typically these will be things like financial trading, fraud identification and process monitoring systems – where you need to identify, make sense of, and react quickly to emerging patterns in a stream of data events. Key Components of a CEP system A CEP system is like your typical database model turned upside down. Whereas a typical database stores data, and runs queries against the data, a CEP data stores queries, and runs data through the queries. To do this it basically needs: Data – in the form of ‘Events’ Queries – using EPL (‘Event Processing Language’) Listeners – code that ‘does something’ if the queries return results A Simple Example - A Nuclear Power Plant Take the example of a Nuclear Power Station.. Now, this is just an example – so please try and suspend your disbelief if you know something about Nuclear Cores, Critical Temperatures, and the like. It’s just an example. I could have picked equally unbelievable financial transaction data. But ... Monitoring the Core Temperature Now I don’t know what the core is, or if it even exists in reality – but for this example lets assume our power station has one, and if it gets too hot – well, very bad things happen.. Lets also assume that we have temperature gauges (thermometers?) in place which take a reading of the core temperature every second – and send the data to a central monitoring system. What are the requirements? We need to be warned when 3 types of events are detected: MONITOR just tell us the average temperature every 10 seconds - for information purposes WARNING WARN us if we have 2 consecutive temperatures above a certain threshold CRITICAL ALERT us if we have 4 consecutive events, with the first one above a certain threshold, and each subsequent one greater than the last – and the last one being 1.5 times greater than the first. This is trying to alert us that we have a sudden, rising escalating temperature spike – a bit like the diagram below. And let’s assume this is a very bad thing. Using Esper There are a number of ways you could approach building a system to handle these requirements. For the purpose of this post though - we will look at using Esper to tackle this problem How we approach this with Esper is: Using Esper – we can create 3 queries (using EPL - Esper Query Language) to model each of these event patterns. We then attach a listener to each query - this will be triggered when the EPL detects a matching pattern of events) We create an Esper service, and register these queries (and their listeners) We can then just throw Temperature data through the service – and let Esper tell alert the listeners when we get matches. (A working example of this simple solution is available on Githib - see link above) Our Simple ESPER Solution At the core of the system are the 3 queries for detecting the events. Query 1 – MONITOR (Just monitor the average temperature) select avg(value) as avg_val from TemperatureEvent.win:time_batch(10 sec) Query 2 – WARN (Tell us if we have 2 consecutive events which breach a threshold) select * from TemperatureEvent " match_recognize ( measures A as temp1, B as temp2 pattern (A B) define A as A.temperature > 400, B as B.temperature > 400) Query 3 – CRITICAL - 4 consecutive rising values above all above 100 with the fourth value being 1.5x greater than the first select * from TemperatureEvent match_recognize ( measures A as temp1, B as temp2, C as temp3, D as temp4 pattern (A B C D) define A as A.temperature > 100, B as (A.temperature < B.value), C as (B.temperature < C.value), D as (C.temperature < D.value) and D.value > (A.value * 1.5)) Some Code Snippets TemperatureEvent We assume our incoming data arrives in the form of a TemperatureEvent POJO If it doesn't - we can convert it to one, e.g. if it comes in via a JMS queue, our queue listener can convert it to a POJO. We don't have to do this, but doing so decouples us from the incoming data structure, and gives us more flexibility if we start to do more processing in our Java code outside the core Esper queries. An example of our POJO is below package com.cor.cep.event; package com.cor.cep.event; import java.util.Date; /** * Immutable Temperature Event class. * The process control system creates these events. * The TemperatureEventHandler picks these up * and processes them. */ public class TemperatureEvent { /** Temperature in Celcius. */ private int temperature; /** Time temerature reading was taken. */ private Date timeOfReading; /** * Single value constructor. * @param value Temperature in Celsius. */ /** * Temerature constructor. * @param temperature Temperature in Celsius * @param timeOfReading Time of Reading */ public TemperatureEvent(int temperature, Date timeOfReading) { this.temperature = temperature; this.timeOfReading = timeOfReading; } /** * Get the Temperature. * @return Temperature in Celsius */ public int getTemperature() { return temperature; } /** * Get time Temperature reading was taken. * @return Time of Reading */ public Date getTimeOfReading() { return timeOfReading; } @Override public String toString() { return "TemperatureEvent [" + temperature + "C]"; } } Handling this Event In our main handler class - TemperatureEventHandler.java, we initialise the Esper service. We register the package containing our TemperatureEvent so the EPL can use it. We also create our 3 statements and add a listener to each statement /** * Auto initialise our service after Spring bean wiring is complete. */ @Override public void afterPropertiesSet() throws Exception { initService(); } /** * Configure Esper Statement(s). */ public void initService() { Configuration config = new Configuration(); // Recognise domain objects in this package in Esper. config.addEventTypeAutoName("com.cor.cep.event"); epService = EPServiceProviderManager.getDefaultProvider(config); createCriticalTemperatureCheckExpression(); createWarningTemperatureCheckExpression(); createTemperatureMonitorExpression(); } An example of creating the Critical Temperature warning and attaching the listener /** * EPL to check for a sudden critical rise across 4 events, * where the last event is 1.5x greater than the first. * This is checking for a sudden, sustained escalating * rise in the temperature */ private void createCriticalTemperatureCheckExpression() { LOG.debug("create Critical Temperature Check Expression"); EPAdministrator epAdmin = epService.getEPAdministrator(); criticalEventStatement = epAdmin.createEPL(criticalEventSubscriber.getStatement()); criticalEventStatement.setSubscriber(criticalEventSubscriber); } And finally - an example of the listener for the Critical event. This just logs some debug - that's as far as this demo goes. package com.cor.cep.subscriber; import java.util.Map; import org.slf4j.Logger; import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; import org.springframework.stereotype.Component; import com.cor.cep.event.TemperatureEvent; /** * Wraps Esper Statement and Listener. No dependency on Esper libraries. */ @Component public class CriticalEventSubscriber implements StatementSubscriber { /** Logger */ private static Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(CriticalEventSubscriber.class); /** Minimum starting threshold for a critical event. */ private static final String CRITICAL_EVENT_THRESHOLD = "100"; /** * If the last event in a critical sequence is this much greater * than the first - issue a critical alert. */ private static final String CRITICAL_EVENT_MULTIPLIER = "1.5"; /** * {@inheritDoc} */ public String getStatement() { // Example using 'Match Recognise' syntax. String criticalEventExpression = "select * from TemperatureEvent " + "match_recognize ( " + "measures A as temp1, B as temp2, C as temp3, D as temp4 " + "pattern (A B C D) " + "define " + " A as A.temperature > " + CRITICAL_EVENT_THRESHOLD + ", " + " B as (A.temperature < B.temperature), " + " C as (B.temperature < C.temperature), " + " D as (C.temperature < D.temperature) " + "and D.temperature > " + "(A.temperature * " + CRITICAL_EVENT_MULTIPLIER + ")" + ")"; return criticalEventExpression; } /** * Listener method called when Esper has detected a pattern match. */ public void update(Map eventMap) { // 1st Temperature in the Critical Sequence TemperatureEvent temp1 = (TemperatureEvent) eventMap.get("temp1"); // 2nd Temperature in the Critical Sequence TemperatureEvent temp2 = (TemperatureEvent) eventMap.get("temp2"); // 3rd Temperature in the Critical Sequence TemperatureEvent temp3 = (TemperatureEvent) eventMap.get("temp3"); // 4th Temperature in the Critical Sequence TemperatureEvent temp4 = (TemperatureEvent) eventMap.get("temp4"); StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); sb.append("***************************************"); sb.append("\n* [ALERT] : CRITICAL EVENT DETECTED! "); sb.append("\n* " + temp1 + " > " + temp2 + " > " + temp3 + " > " + temp4); sb.append("\n***************************************"); LOG.debug(sb.toString()); } } The Running Demo Full instructions for running the demo can be found here: https://github.com/corsoft/esper-demo-nuclear An example of the running demo is shown below - it generates random Temperature events and sends them through the Esper processor (in the real world this would come in via a JMS queue, http endpoint or socket listener). When any of our 3 queries detect a match - debug is dumped to the console. In a real world solution each of these 3 listeners would handle the events differently - maybe by sending messages to alert queues/endpoints for other parts of the system to pick up the processing. Conclusions Using a system like Esper is a neat way to monitor and spot patterns in data in real time with minimal code. This is obviously (and intentionally) a very bare bones demo, barely touching the surface of the capabilities available. Check out the Esper web site for more info and demos. Esper also has a plugin for Apache Camel Integration engine - which allows you to configure you EPL queries directly in XML Spring camel routes, removing the need for any Java code completely (we will possibly cover this in a later blog post!)

Recently I found myself sending more and more business metrics to Datadog, a Software as a Service solution that promises to collect all your data points and build business metrics, displaying them as graphs and triggering alerts whenever they get to critically low (or high) levels. The goals The more your automated tests raises their level of abstraction, the more they become oriented to external quality (what the customer wants and does) instead of internal quality (low coupling, high cohesion of the software design). The largest end-to-end tests that we have in place at Onebip connect several different projects on an integration server and run everything from the creation of a purchase or subscription to its renewal and termination (events that would happen months after creation). However, even end-to-end tests cannot guarantee that our applications work against external resources, such as merchants, mobile carrier, and ISPs. The only way to catch integration problems is monitoring. These problems, like a mobile carrier experiencing an outage, may be due to our errors or to external conditions; but they should nevertheless be discovered as early as possible. The infrastructure Datadog is the only data-collection service that passed the stress tests of SLL, our solution architect. It ships as an UDP server that you pay basing on the number of machines you want to run it on; for example, a preproduction and a production server are a common choice to start out. The server collects data locally and periodically uploads it to Datadog in bursts, where you can access it via a web application or via APIs in case you want to call it from your build. The UDP protocol is aligned with the goals of metric collections: a silent server that decouples the sending of metrics from the rest of the business logic: UDP packets are just lost if no process is there listening to them, no errors are raised if the server crashes or is not running or installed for some reason for instance in development machines). The monitoring code, which you write, should be decoupled and asynchronous as much as possible. The part that talks over the network is already externalized in the DataDog server, but you don't want the user to wait because you have to send some strange number. So the internal part (sending via UDP) is performed in Listener objects that implement the Observer pattern. These object still have to be wrapped in all-encompassing try/catch constructs so that any errors in the monitoring part never influence the business logic. Againg, you don't want a payment to fail because of an exception in how monitoring DateTime objects are built. For PHP we built a SilentListener class to wrap all of our object: class SilentListener { private $wrapped; public function __construct($wrapped) { $this->wrapped = $wrapped; } public function __call($method, $args) { try { call_user_func_array(array($this->wrapped, $method), $args); } catch (Exception $e) { $this->log($e); } } }SLL An example In some countries, we receive payments through mobile-originated messages (MO), a fancy word for saying SMS sent by the end user. So a simple way to monitor if we are receiving payment or if the server is exploded is to upload a metric counting them every time we receive one (pseudo-JSON format to show you the data): { counter: 1 } However, we can be more precise than this: an external outage or an integration problem may happen to a lower level than the whole application. For example, MOs can be delayed in Argentina, by a single carrier, while the rest of the world is still working fine. So our data points look like this: { counter: 1, tags: { country: "IT", carrier: "Vodafone", merchant: "Tasty Cookies, Inc.", } } and in turn graphs on DataDog or calls to its API can set up filters so that we can, if necessary, view only the data related to any combination of country, carrier and merchant. The nice thing, SLL says, is that you just start send data from production and only after you have data points available you build a graph or an alert system basing on what appears to be the most important tags. For example, a big merchant may benefit from some dedicated monitoring, while minor countries such as Vietnam should be monitored as a whole since their traffic is by far lower than that of the others.

I’ve mentioned in a past post that it was conceived while reading the source code for the System.Diagnostics.Process class. This post is about the reason that pushed me to read the source code in an attempt to fix the issue. It turned out that this was yet another case of LeakyAbstraction, which is a special interest of mine. As it turned out, this post ended being way too long (even for me). I don’t like installments, but I felt that it is something that is worth trying as the size was prohibitive for single-post consumption. As such, I’ve split it up on 5 parts, so that each part would be around a 1000 words or less. I’ll post one part a day. To give you an idea of the scope and subject of what’s to come, here is a quick overview. In part 1 I’ll lay out the problem. We are trying to spawn processes, read their output and kill if they take too long. Our first attempt is to use simple synchronous I/O to read the output and discover a deadlock. We solve the deadlock using asynchronous I/O. In part 2 we parallelize the code and discover reduced performance and yet another deadlock. We create a testbed and set about to investigate the problem at depth. In part 3 we will find out the root cause and we’ll discuss the mechanics (how and why) we hit such a problem. In part 4 we’ll discuss solutions to the problem and develop a generic solutions (with code) to fix the problem. Finally, in part 5 we see whether or not a generic solution could work before we summarize and conclude. Let’s begin at the very beginning. Suppose you want to execute some program (call it child), get all its output (and error) and, if it doesn’t exit within some time limit, kill it. Notice that there is no interaction and no input. This is how tests are executed in Phalanger using a test runner. Synchronous I/O The Process class has conveniently exposed the underlying pipes to the child process using stream instances StandardOutput and StandardError. And, like many, we too might be tempted to simply call StandardOutput.ReadToEnd() and StandardError.ReadToEnd(). Albeit, that would work, until it doesn’t. As Raymond Chen noted, it’ll work as long as the data fits into the internal pipe buffer. The problem with this approach is that we are asking to read until we reach the end of the data, which will only happen for certainty when the child process we spawned exits. However, when the buffer of the pipe which the child writes its output to is full, the child has to wait until there is free space in the buffer to write to. But, you say, what if we always read and empty the buffer? Good idea, except, we need to do that for both StandardOutput and StandardError at the same time. In the StandardOutput.ReadToEnd() call we read every byte coming in the buffer until the child process exits. While we have drained the StandardOutput buffer (so that the child process can’t be possibly blocked on that,) if it fills the StandardError buffer, which we aren’t reading yet, we will deadlock. The child won’t exit until it fully writes to the StandardError buffer (which is full because no one is reading it,) meanwhile, we are waiting for the process to exit so we can be sure we read to the end of the StandardOutput before we return (and start reading StandardError). The same problem exists for StandardOutput, if we first read StandardError, hence the need to drain both pipe buffers as they are fed, not one after the other. Async Reading The obvious (and only practical) solution is to read both pipes at the same time using separate threads. To that end, there are mainly two approaches. The pre-4.0 approach (async events), and the 4.5-and-up approach (tasks). Async Reading with Events The code is reasonably straight forward as it uses .Net events. We have two manual-reset events and two delegates that get called asynchronously when we read a line from each pipe. We get null data when we hit the end of file (i.e. when the process exits) for each of the two pipes. public static string ExecWithAsyncEvents(string path, string args, int timeoutMs) { using (var outputWaitHandle = new ManualResetEvent(false)) { using (var errorWaitHandle = new ManualResetEvent(false)) { using (var process = new Process()) { process.StartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo(path); process.StartInfo.Arguments = args; process.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false; process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true; process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardError = true; process.StartInfo.ErrorDialog = false; process.StartInfo.CreateNoWindow = true; var sb = new StringBuilder(1024); process.OutputDataReceived += (sender, e) => { sb.AppendLine(e.Data); if (e.Data == null) { outputWaitHandle.Set(); } }; process.ErrorDataReceived += (sender, e) => { sb.AppendLine(e.Data); if (e.Data == null) { errorWaitHandle.Set(); } }; process.Start(); process.BeginOutputReadLine(); process.BeginErrorReadLine(); process.WaitForExit(timeoutMs); outputWaitHandle.WaitOne(timeoutMs); errorWaitHandle.WaitOne(timeoutMs); process.CancelErrorRead(); process.CancelOutputRead(); return sb.ToString(); } } } } We certainly can improve on the above code (for example we should make the total wait limit <= timeoutMs) but you get the point with this sample. Also, no error handling or killing the child process when it times out and doesn’t exit. Async Reading with Tasks A much more simplified and sanitized approach is to use the new System.Threading.Tasks namespace/framework to do all the heavy-lifting for us. As you can see, the code has been cut by half and it’s much more readable, but we need Framework 4.5 and newer for this to work (although my target is 4.0, but for comparison purposes I gave it a spin). The results are the same. public static string ExecWithAsyncTasks(string path, string args, int timeout) { using (var process = new Process()) { process.StartInfo = new ProcessStartInfo(path); process.StartInfo.Arguments = args; process.StartInfo.UseShellExecute = false; process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardOutput = true; process.StartInfo.RedirectStandardError = true; process.StartInfo.ErrorDialog = false; process.StartInfo.CreateNoWindow = true; var sb = new StringBuilder(1024); process.Start(); var stdOutTask = process.StandardOutput.ReadToEndAsync(); var stdErrTask = process.StandardError.ReadToEndAsync(); process.WaitForExit(timeout); stdOutTask.Wait(timeout); stdErrTask.Wait(timeout); return sb.ToString(); } } Again, a healthy doze of error-handling is in order, but for illustration purposes left out. A point worthy of mention is that we can’t assume we read the streams by the time the child exits. There is a race condition and we still need to wait for the I/O operations to finish before we can read the results. In the next part we’ll parallelize the execution in an attempt to maximize efficiency and concurrency.

Generally, you pick up a subset of components in some integration tests to check if they are glued as expected. To achieve this, they are usually really invoked, but sometimes, it is too expensive to do so. For example, Component A invokes Component B, and Component B has a dependency on an external system which does not have a test server. We really want to verify the configurations, it seems the only way is replacing Component B with test double after wiring Component A and B. Let's start with Strategy A: Manual Injecting @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) @ContextConfiguration(locations = "classpath:config.xml") public class SomeAppIntegrationTestsUsingManualReplacing { private Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery(); （1） private SomeInterface mock = context.mock(SomeInterface.class); （2） @Resource(name = "someApp") private SomeApp someApp; （3） @Before public void replaceDependenceWithMock() { someApp.setDependence(mock); （4） } @DirtiesContext @Test public void returnsHelloWorldIfDependenceIsAvailable() throws Exception { context.checking(new Expectations() { { allowing(mock).isAvailable(); will(returnValue(true)); （5） } }); String actual = someApp.returnHelloWorld(); assertEquals("helloWorld", actual); context.assertIsSatisfied(); （6） } } We get a spring bean someApp(Component A in this case), and it has a denpendence on SomeInterface's(Component B in this case). We inject mock (declare and init at step 4) to someApp, thus the test passes without sending request to the external system. The context.assertIsSatisfied()(at step 6 ) is very important as we use SpringJUnit4ClassRunner as junit runner instead of JMock, so you have to explictly assert that all expectations are satisfied. There are two downsides of the previous strategy: Firstly, if there are more than one mock, you have to inject them one by one, which is very tedious especially when you need to inject mocks into serveral spring bean. Secondly, the wiring is not tested. For example, if I forget to write the integration tests using manual inject strategy is not going to tell. Strategy B: Using predefined BeanPostProcessor Spring provides BeanPostProcessor which is very useful when you want to replace some bean after the wiring is done. According to the reference, application context will auto detect all BeanPostProcessor registered in metadata(usually in xml format). public class PredefinedBeanPostProcessor implements BeanPostProcessor { public Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery(); （1） public SomeInterface mock = context.mock(SomeInterface.class); （2） @Override public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException { return bean; } @Override public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException { if ("dependence".equals(beanName)) { return mock; } else { return bean; } } } @RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class) @ContextConfiguration(locations = { "classpath:config.xml", "classpath:predefined.xml" }) （1） public class SomeAppIntegrationTestsUsingPredefinedReplacing { @Resource(name = "someApp") private SomeApp someApp; @Resource(name = "predefined") private PredefinedBeanPostProcessor fixture; @Test public void returnsHelloWorldIfDependenceIsAvailable() throws Exception { fixture.context.checking(new Expectations() { { allowing(fixture.mock).isAvailable(); will(returnValue(true)); } }); String actual = someApp.returnHelloWorld(); assertEquals("helloWorld", actual); fixture.context.assertIsSatisfied(); } } Notice there is an extra config xml in which the PredefinedBeanPostProcessor is registered(at step 1). The predefined.xml is placed in src/test/resources/, so it will not be packed into the artifact for production. For each test, using Strategy B requires inputting both a java file and a xml which is quite verbose. Now we have learned the pros and cons of Strategy A and Strategy B. What about a hybrid version -- killing two birds with one stone. Therefore we have the next strategy. Strategy C：Dynamic Injecting public class TestDoubleInjector implements BeanPostProcessor { private static Map MOCKS = new HashMap(); （1） @Override public Object postProcessBeforeInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException { return bean; } @Override public Object postProcessAfterInitialization(Object bean, String beanName) throws BeansException { if (MOCKS.containsKey(beanName)) { return MOCKS.get(beanName); } return bean; } public void addMock(String beanName, Object mock) { MOCKS.put(beanName, mock); } public void clear() { MOCKS.clear(); } } @RunWith(JMock.class) public class SomeAppIntegrationTestsUsingDynamicReplacing { private Mockery context = new JUnit4Mockery(); private SomeInterface mock = context.mock(SomeInterface.class); private SomeApp someApp; private ConfigurableApplicationContext applicationContext; private TestDoubleInjector fixture = new TestDoubleInjector(); （1） @Before public void replaceDependenceWithMock() { fixture.addMock("dependence", mock); （2） applicationContext = new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[] { "classpath:config.xml", "classpath:dynamic.xml" }); （3） someApp = (SomeApp) applicationContext.getBean("someApp"); } @Test public void returnsHelloWorldIfDependenceIsAvailable() throws Exception { context.checking(new Expectations() { { allowing(mock).isAvailable(); will(returnValue(true)); } }); String actual = someApp.returnHelloWorld(); assertEquals("helloWorld", actual); } @After public void clean() { applicationContext.close(); fixture.clear(); } } The TestDoubleInjector class is an implementation of Monostate pattern. Mocks are added to the static map before the application context being created. When another TestDoubleInjector instance (defined in dynamic.xml) is initiated, it can share the static map for replacement. Just beware to clear the static map after tests. By the way, you could use Stub instead of Mocks with same strategies. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you might have any questions. And I do appreciate it, if you could let me know you have a better idea. Thanks! Resources： http://www.jmock.org http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/entarch/spring-aop-with-ejb5-093994.html(I saw BeanPostProcessor the first time in this post)