Event Sourcing Explained: Building Robust Systems With Immutable Event Logs
In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the concept of event sourcing: what it entails, its benefits, general flow, and key concepts.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeAn architectural pattern named Event Sourcing is gaining more and more recognition from developers who aim for strong and scalable systems. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the concept of it: what it entails, its benefits, general flow, and key concepts. Moreover, we will discuss how to implement ES — some details on the technologies that make adoption easy.
This article is aimed at software architects, system developers, and project managers who might be contemplating or are already engaged in integrating Event Sourcing into their systems.
What Is Event Sourcing?
The basic idea of Event Sourcing is to store the history of changes in an application state as a sequence of events. These events can't be changed once stored in an immutable log, which means that the system's current state can be recovered by playing back these events. The idea is different from what happens in typical systems where the state itself is kept and not how it came to be.
It is important to also outline the most fundamental principles of ES:
- State as a sequence of events: Store changes as a series of immutable events rather than the current state
- Event immutability: Events cannot be changed or deleted upon creation
- Event replay: Reconstruct the current state or a view by replaying events from the beginning
Event Sourcing has a number of advantages that make the system strong and adaptable. One key advantage is that it ensures data integrity and keeps everything well-organized with a clear audit trail, making it easy to trace any changes. This ensures that every change made is unchangeable, hence providing an elaborate history of changes made, which makes it valuable during system failures. The other benefit includes easy horizontal scaling where the load can be distributed to multiple parallel handlers of the events thus complemented by architectural flexibility. Furthermore, an introduction to Event Sourcing would be incomplete without mentioning its perfect fit in systems needing an exhaustive audit trail such as fintech projects.
Key Terms in Event Sourcing
- Command: An action request (imperative verb) performed by a user or external actor (external system).
- Event: The result of a command (verb in the past tense).
- Aggregate Root: A key concept from Domain-Driven Design (DDD) representing the main entity in a group of closely related entities (aggregate). This entity handles commands and generates events based on the state of the aggregate (command, aggregateState) => events[].
- AggregateState: The state of the aggregate. It doesn't need to contain all data, only the data required for validation and decision-making on which events to generate.
- Saga: An entity opposite to an aggregate - it listens to events and generates commands. A saga is typically a state machine and often requires persistence for its state.
- View: An entity that listens to events and performs side effects, such as creating a database table with data optimized for fast frontend access.
- Query: A data read request to the aggregateState or to the data produced in a view.
General Flow
The process of updating an event-sourced entity can be represented in pseudocode:
- (0): Restoring state from snapshot or by replaying events from the beginning.
- (1): Transform a command into events or an error based on the current state.
- (2): Persist events in the log.
- (3): Apply each event sequentially to the state generating a new state.
- (4): Persist the new state snapshot for quick access.
- (5): Respond to the caller with a report on the completed work.
Additionally, events are applied asynchronously to views and sagas, enabling flexible, decoupled architectures that can evolve over time.
In the image below, you can see the typical data flow for event-sourced applications when updating data by sending commands to the aggregate.
For reading data, you can send a query to the aggregate for a strongly consistent but potentially slower result, or send a query to the view for an optimized but usually eventually consistent result.
Benefits
- System state recovery allows the restoration of the system state at any given point (perhaps even before an unfortunate failure).
- Audit and traceability ensure that a detailed history of all changes made is provided for further analysis.
- Scalability can be achieved through horizontal scaling of event processing.
- Flexibility: Easy adaptation to new requirements and changes. Views can be rebuilt from scratch, and aggregate states can be reconstructed from scratch.
Challenges
On the other hand, Event Sourcing brings along with it several challenges that need to be managed with finesse for its effective implementation.
- Designing correct events and aggregates: Mistakes in the design of aggregates can be costly. The need for Event Storming and the adaptation of DDD modeling arises to find good boundaries.
- Storage requirements: Events can accumulate over time.
- Solution: Consider databases — NoSQL stores or specialized solutions for the right event storage.
- Performance issues: Optimizing event store queries.
- Ensuring consistency: Since views are updated eventually, implementing eventual consistency in the UI can be challenging, requiring careful management of delays to ensure they do not disrupt the user experience.
- Testing: Developing tests for systems based on ES.
- Single-writer pattern implementation in a cluster or multi-datacenter: Implementing ES in a cluster can be challenging because you need to create transactional boundaries to make sure only one node must write events (step (2) in the example) for a single entity at a time. ES in a multi-datacenter is even more challenging, often requiring modeling of additional commands and events for explicit cross-data center synchronization processes.
Where To Use Event Sourcing
Event Sourcing is a powerful architectural pattern that excels in specific scenarios:
Complex Business Domains
If there are lots of state changes, coupled with convoluted business logic, Event Sourcing creates a perfect audit trail. This is mostly applicable to cases of compliance, and even more to financial services (including banking and trading systems) as well as healthcare (comprising patient records and treatment histories).
Auditing and Compliance
The immutable event log of Event Sourcing is highly beneficial in industries that have strict regulatory requirements because every change is documented. This practice finds its primary applications in insurance (for keeping records of claim processing and policy changes) as well as government (for legislative processes and public records management).
Debugging and Troubleshooting
A key benefit of Event Sourcing is that it allows the recreation of past states by replaying events— this can help developers greatly with error analysis as well as testing. It lets you trace back through the sequence of events that led up to any particular issue, enabling root cause identification or even running simulations based on an event playback.
Event-Driven Architectures
Event-driven Architectures work hand in hand with Event Sourcing, elevating microservices further through the facilitation of state synchronization and empowering real-time applications. This happens with live updates and collaboration features, thereby ensuring that the entire system remains performant despite growing demands placed upon it due to scalability needs.
Scalability and Performance
Decoupling read and write models optimizes performance, making Event Sourcing ideal for high-volume systems like e-commerce platforms and social networks, as well as for data analysis, performing complex queries on historical data.
Technologies for Implementation
The proper implementation of Event Sourcing implies the need for a collection of technologies suited to various aspects of architectural demands. Among the solutions that can be recommended without hesitation for event stream persistence is EventStoreDB. It is well-suited for Event Sourcing and comes with a variety of tools related to different aspects of event management — storage, retrieval, and real-time event handling — that are instrumental in sustaining the performance and consistency of event-driven systems.
Two other frameworks play an important role in this regard: Akka and Pekko, besides specialized storage The frameworks assist in managing this sophisticated flow of asynchronous data — including system resilience (ability to remain operational) and scalability (ability to handle increased loads) — which must be introduced with a dynamic environment typical for event-driven architectures.
When it comes to organizations with unique needs that generic solutions fail to address, implementing Event Sourcing on a custom basis offers the needed adaptability. But these bespoke systems have to be put together; only a good grasp of ES principles will keep them away from typical traps like performance bottlenecks or data consistency problems. Be ready for a heavy investment in development and testing if you're going to create your own Event Sourcing system — ensure that the system is not only robust but also scalable.
Conclusion
The implementation of Event Sourcing is a pattern that greatly improves the quality and traceability of applications if implemented correctly; it also increases reliability and scalability. It demands a thorough understanding of its concepts and careful planning but offers substantial long-term benefits.
If you are looking at building systems that are ready not only to meet the current needs but also any future changes and challenges, think about embracing Event Sourcing.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Comments