Unit vs Integration Testing: What's the Difference?
In this article, we will see the definition and the difference between unit and integration testing.
Join the DZone community and get the full member experience.
Join For FreeWhat Is Unit Testing?
Unit testing entails testing each unit or an individual component of the product application. The goal of unit testing is to approve unit parts as they are executed. A unit is a single testable component of a product framework tested during the application programming development process.
The goal of unit testing is to ensure the accuracy of segregated code. A unit segment is an application's individual capability or code.
Unit testing is often performed by engineers using the white box testing approach.
When the program is ready and provided to the tester, they will start checking each segment of the module or module of the application freely or separately. This interaction is known as unit testing.
Why Unit Testing?
In a testing level progression, unit testing is the primary level of testing performed before incorporation and further levels of testing. It employs modules for the testing cycle, which reduces the need to wait for results. Unit testing frameworks, stubs, and drivers are used to aid with unit testing.
In general, the product undergoes four levels of testing: unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and acceptance testing. However, due to time constraints, programming analyzers may perform insignificant unit testing; however, skipping unit testing may result in higher deformities during Integration Testing, System Testing, and Acceptance Testing, which occurs after the execution of the programming application.
What Is Integration Testing?
Integration testing is the second phase of product testing, following unit testing. Units or individual segments of the product are tested in a group setting during this testing.
The goal of integration testing is to detect flaws at the point of connection between incorporated pieces. Modules are used in unit testing for testing purposes, and these modules are combined and tested in coordination testing. The software is built using various programming modules written by various coders or developers.
The goal of integration testing is to ensure the accuracy of correspondence between all components. Therefore, when all parts or modules are working independently, we need to check the information stream between the reliant components, known as integration testing.
Why Integration Testing?
Every module is built by a single programming designer, whose programming logic may differ from engineers of various modules; therefore, integration testing becomes critical to determining the functionality of programming modules. If the communication of programming modules with the information base is incorrect, it must be checked. At the time of module improvement, necessities can be altered or upgraded. Because these new criteria may not be tried at the level of unit testing, integration testing becomes mandatory. Inconsistency between programming modules may result in errors.
Unit vs Integration Testing
| Unit Testing | Integration Testing |
|---|---|
| Unit testing is a type of testing that checks to see if the small piece of code is performing what it is supposed to do. | Integration testing is a type of testing that determines whether or not various modules are cooperating. |
| Unit testing checks a solitary part of an application. | The conduct of combination modules is considered in the Integration testing. |
| Unit testing has a limited scope; it only covers the unit or small portion of code that is being tested. As a result, while writing a unit test, more constrained codes that target just a single class are used. | Integration testing has a broad scope; it encompasses the entire program under test and requires significantly more effort to put together. |
| There should be no conditions on code outside the unit being tested in unit tests. | Other external frameworks, such as data sets, hardware allocated for them, and so on, affect combination testing. |
| This is the initial type of testing in the Software testing life cycle, and it is often performed by an engineer. | This type of testing is conducted by the testing group after get-togethers testing and before System testing. |
| Unit testing is not further divided into other types. | Integration testing is further divided into other types, such as hierarchical integration, bottom-up integration, etc. |
| Unit testing begins with the module determination. | Integration testing begins with interface determination. |
| Unit testing covers the entire visibility of the code. | Integration testing examines the clarity of the combination structure. |
| Unit testing mostly focuses on evaluating the utility of individual units and does not identify issues that arise when different modules interact with one another. | Integration testing must be conducted in order to identify issues that arise when separate modules communicate with one another in order to put together a general framework. |
Conclusion
Following the development of the individual modules, integration testing will help to confirm the overall framework. In addition, when issues are discovered in the Integration test, the unit testing results for explicit usefulness will aid in the resolution of the problem.
Therefore both Unit testing and Integration testing are similarly significant.
Published at DZone with permission of Risha Bhat. See the original article here.
Opinions expressed by DZone contributors are their own.
Comments